What Verdica's 649 score means for Tun Wei Wang
Tun Wei Wang's composite score of 649 out of 850 places this accounting provider in the elevated risk band (580–669). This means the provider meets minimum regulatory thresholds but carries identifiable compliance concerns that warrant closer attention before engagement. A score in this range suggests a mixed profile: strong performance in some areas offset by material weaknesses in others.
For a business owner or financial decision-maker, a 649 score is neither a red flag nor a green light. It signals that due diligence is necessary. The provider is licensed and operating, but the gap between this score and the "acceptable" threshold (670+) is narrow enough to warrant a direct conversation about the specific areas of concern. Readers should treat this as a starting point for questions, not a final recommendation.
How the sub-scores break down
License & Credentials (320/850): This is the primary drag on Tun Wei Wang's overall score. A sub-score of 320 in this dimension is substantially below average and indicates material gaps in licensure status, credential currency, or registration standing with Colorado's state board. In the accounting field, this category tracks whether a provider holds required licenses (CPA, permit to practice, etc.), whether those credentials are active and in good standing, and whether any lapsed or restricted registrations exist. A low score here suggests either expired credentials, incomplete registration, or other licensing impediments that would concern any client seeking professional accounting services.
PCAOB Record (810/850): This sub-score reflects Tun Wei Wang's audit quality and regulatory history as tracked by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. A score of 810 is strong and indicates no significant findings from PCAOB inspections or audit deficiencies on record. This suggests competent audit execution and reasonable compliance with auditing standards, at least for any public company or SEC-regulated clients.
Disciplinary (850/850): A perfect score here means no disciplinary actions, complaints, or sanctions are recorded in available state or federal databases. This is a positive signal and indicates a clean history with respect to formal enforcement actions.
What regulators in CO track for accounting providers
Colorado's state board and the PCAOB monitor accounting providers across overlapping but distinct jurisdictions. The state board oversees licensure, continuing education compliance, and fitness-to-practice standards. Violations might include practicing without a current CPA license, failing to complete required professional development hours, or misrepresenting credentials.
The PCAOB, which has federal authority, inspects audit quality and compliance with auditing standards for firms that audit public companies or broker-dealers. PCAOB findings focus on audit execution—whether work papers are adequate, whether evidence supports conclusions, and whether the firm maintains quality controls. Audit deficiencies, insufficient evidence documentation, or systemic quality issues would lower a PCAOB sub-score.
The disciplinary dimension aggregates enforcement actions from both regulators plus civil and criminal records tied to professional misconduct. Violations here might range from minor complaint resolutions to major sanctions like license suspension or revocation.
These three dimensions together create a picture of both technical competence (PCAOB), legal standing (License & Credentials), and ethical history (Disciplinary).
Bottom line
Tun Wei Wang's 649 score reflects a provider with a clean disciplinary record and acceptable audit performance, but meaningful licensing or credentialing gaps that create elevated risk. Before engaging this provider, confirm that all required licenses are current and that the state board registration is in active standing. Request a direct explanation of the licensing concerns flagged in Verdica's data. No customer reviews are yet available to provide additional perspective.