What Verdica's 656 score means for William Stanton
William Stanton's composite score of 656 out of 850 places this accounting provider in the "elevated risk" band (580–669). This grade B rating signals that while the provider meets baseline regulatory requirements, there are meaningful compliance gaps or historical concerns that warrant attention from prospective clients.
The score should be interpreted as a yellow flag rather than a red one. A business or individual considering engaging William Stanton should proceed with informed caution—not avoidance—but should conduct additional due diligence before committing to a relationship. The elevated risk designation reflects that this provider has demonstrated some track record of regulatory oversight or credential limitations, but has not exhibited the severe or systemic failures that would trigger a "high risk" classification.
One notable feature of this profile is the absence of independent customer reviews indexed on Verdica. This means the score is based entirely on regulator-maintained data (PCAOB audit findings and state board registration records). A prospective client cannot supplement the regulatory picture with direct user feedback, making the official compliance metrics more important as a decision input.
How the sub-scores break down
License & Credentials (340 / 850): This is the weakest component of William Stanton's profile. A score of 340 suggests gaps or deficiencies in professional licensing, certifications, or credential verification relative to industry standards. In the accounting field, this dimension typically reflects whether a provider holds required CPA licenses, maintains current registrations with state boards, holds necessary PCAOB registration (if applicable), and keeps required continuing education current. A low score in this area indicates that something in this credential foundation is incomplete, lapsed, or non-compliant with Colorado state requirements or federal standards.
PCAOB Record (810 / 850): This is William Stanton's strongest sub-score. The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board maintains detailed audit inspection records and quality control findings for firms that audit public companies or provide related services. A score of 810 indicates that PCAOB's oversight of this provider's work has not surfaced major red flags, though the score is not perfect. Minor audit quality findings, documentation deficiencies, or procedural observations may still be present, but significant violations appear absent.
Disciplinary (850 / 850): A perfect score on disciplinary history means no formal sanctions, fines, suspensions, or enforcement actions are indexed on Verdica's underlying regulatory databases. This is a positive indicator that William Stanton has not faced formal censure from state boards, the PCAOB, or other oversight bodies—at least not in records currently available.
What regulators in CO track for accounting providers
Colorado's state board and the PCAOB maintain complementary oversight frameworks. State boards verify that individual and firm licenses remain active, track disciplinary actions (including complaints, investigations, and sanctions), and monitor compliance with state-specific continuing professional education (CPE) requirements.
The PCAOB, a federally created body, conducts periodic inspections of registered accounting firms, focusing on audit quality, independence compliance, and adherence to standards. PCAOB findings may identify deficiencies in engagement quality reviews, insufficient audit procedures, or weaknesses in compliance systems—issues that don't always rise to formal discipline but still affect a firm's risk profile.
Scores move based on the presence or absence of audit findings, licensing lapses, complaint history, disciplinary records, and whether documented remediation has occurred. A provider's credentials sub-score may drop if licenses are inactive, if required registrations are missing, or if board certifications have lapsed.
Bottom line
William Stanton presents a mixed compliance picture: strong PCAOB audit performance and clean disciplinary history are offset by notable credential or licensing gaps. Anyone considering this provider should request current proof of all relevant licenses and registrations, clarify the nature of the credential deficiencies reflected in the 340 sub-score, and verify that any ongoing remediation plans are in place.