What Verdica's 850 score means for BAUGHMAN DAVID W
BAUGHMAN DAVID W has achieved Verdica's maximum composite score of 850 out of 850, placing the entity in the "excellent" band (800–850). This score reflects a clean record across all three regulatory dimensions that Verdica tracks: Certificate Standing, FAA Enforcement, and Service Difficulty Reports.
A score at this level indicates that the FAA's airworthiness records and enforcement databases show no active compliance concerns, violations, or service defect patterns associated with this aviation provider. Readers should interpret this as evidence of regulatory alignment—the entity has maintained current certification status and has not triggered enforcement action or accumulated a pattern of recurring maintenance or design issues flagged by operators.
It's important to note that this score is based entirely on public FAA records and does not include independent customer reviews, which remain unavailable for this entity at this time. The score reflects regulatory standing, not customer satisfaction or service breadth.
How the sub-scores break down
Certificate Standing: 850
This sub-score measures whether the entity holds current, valid FAA airworthiness certificates and whether those certificates carry any restrictions, suspensions, or administrative actions. A perfect score here means BAUGHMAN DAVID W maintains certificates in good standing with no recorded limitations or compliance holds from the FAA.
FAA Enforcement: 850
This dimension tracks regulatory enforcement actions—warnings, citations, fines, or corrective action orders issued by the FAA. A perfect score indicates no enforcement history in the FAA's public records. In the aviation industry, enforcement data typically reflects serious issues: failure to comply with maintenance standards, improper certification practices, or violations of operational regulations. The absence of any enforcement action is a strong signal of regulatory compliance.
Service Difficulty Reports: 850
Service Difficulty Reports (SDRs) are mandatory submissions from operators, manufacturers, and service centers to the FAA whenever an aircraft component or system experiences a defect, malfunction, or failure. A perfect score means either no SDRs have been filed against this entity, or the patterns observed do not constitute a compliance concern. Accumulating SDRs can indicate recurring quality or maintenance issues. A clean slate here suggests products or services have not generated significant field safety problems.
What regulators in NM track for aviation providers
The FAA maintains two primary databases that feed Verdica's scoring model:
Airworthiness Certificates and Maintenance Records
The FAA issues and tracks certificates for aircraft, engines, propellers, and components. Providers holding these certificates must maintain compliance with design, manufacturing, and maintenance standards. The FAA can suspend or revoke certificates if an entity fails audits, misses required inspections, or violates repair standards. Restrictions or administrative holds lower scores in this dimension.
Enforcement and Compliance Actions
The FAA's Office of Investigations and Enforcement publishes civil penalties, warnings, and compliance orders when violations occur. Common infractions include inadequate maintenance procedures, use of unapproved parts, failure to report defects, or operating outside the scope of certification. Each action is logged and publicly available. Entities with clean enforcement records have not triggered these mechanisms.
Service Difficulty Report Patterns
The FAA requires anyone discovering a defect in an aircraft or component to file an SDR. Regulators review these reports to identify systemic problems—if multiple SDRs point to the same manufacturer or service center, it flags a quality trend. Providers with no SDRs or only isolated reports show fewer recurring issues in field operations.
New Mexico, as a state, does not independently regulate aviation certificates; the FAA holds exclusive authority over airworthiness and certification.
Bottom line
BAUGHMAN DAVID W presents as a low-risk provider based on regulatory data, with no flags in FAA records, enforcement history, or service defect reports. Anyone considering working with this entity should request recent customer references and service records directly, since Verdica does not yet have indexed independent reviews to cross-check the regulatory picture.