What Verdica's 850 score means for BROWN TONY A JR
BROWN TONY A JR in Mississippi has earned a composite score of 850 out of 850, placing them in Verdica's excellent category (800–850 range). This score reflects a complete absence of documented compliance red flags across three regulatory dimensions tracked by the FAA. A reader should interpret this as: the FAA's public records show no active enforcement actions, no airworthiness certificate suspensions or revocations, and no pattern of service difficulty reports that would indicate systemic operational problems.
The score does not certify competence, customer satisfaction, or operational quality beyond what regulators measure. It means regulatory records available to the public contain no adverse findings. For a business owner or consumer evaluating this provider, an 850 score signals low regulatory risk based on FAA oversight—a meaningful but narrow datapoint that should be cross-checked with direct references, insurance status, and specific service requirements before commitment.
How the sub-scores break down
Certificate Standing (850): This sub-score measures whether the provider holds valid FAA airworthiness certificates and whether those certificates are current and unrestricted. A perfect 850 indicates no lapses, revocations, or conditional certifications on record. In aviation, loss or suspension of certificate standing is a severe regulatory action, typically triggered by maintenance failures, unsafe operations, or failure to meet training standards. A clean certificate standing is a baseline expectation, not an achievement—but its absence would be a disqualifying risk factor.
FAA Enforcement (850): This sub-score aggregates FAA enforcement actions: civil penalties, airworthiness directives non-compliance, pilot deviation findings, or other formal regulatory sanctions. An 850 means no such actions appear in FAA public enforcement records for this entity. In the aviation industry, enforcement history is a leading indicator of operational discipline. Even minor violations—missed inspections, late reporting, procedural lapses—create enforcement records. The absence of any record suggests consistent adherence to regulatory procedures, though it does not guarantee quality or customer experience.
Service Difficulty Reports (850): This sub-score reflects data from FAA Service Difficulty Reports (SDRs), which are voluntary and mandatory incident reports filed by operators, maintenance providers, and manufacturers. An 850 indicates either no SDRs filed against this provider or a pattern that does not raise statistical flags. SDRs capture in-service failures, maintenance defects, or operational anomalies. A high score does not mean zero incidents—it means reported incidents do not cluster in ways that trigger FAA escalation or investigation. In regulated markets, absence of SDRs can reflect either excellent operations or low reporting activity; context matters.
What regulators in MS track for aviation providers
The FAA maintains airworthiness certificates for operators and maintains a public enforcement database organized by certificate holder, violation type, and outcome. Certificates are renewed cyclically and are contingent on passing inspections, maintaining training currency, and filing required reports. Violations typically include maintenance log deficiencies, improper repairs, failure to address manufacturer directives, unlicensed technician work, or operational deviations.
Enforcement escalates from warning notices to civil penalties (typically $1,000–$27,500 per violation) to certificate action (suspension or revocation). Service Difficulty Reports are filed voluntarily or mandatorily depending on incident severity; clusters of SDRs trigger FAA investigation and can precede enforcement.
Mississippi providers operate under the same FAA oversight as any U.S. aviation entity. The public records Verdica indexes—certificates and enforcement actions—are the primary regulatory trail available to consumers and businesses.
Bottom line
BROWN TONY A JR presents minimal regulatory risk based on FAA public records: no enforcement actions, no certificate issues, and no significant service difficulty report pattern. Before engaging, verify current insurance, request direct customer references, confirm specific certifications match your service need, and review any contracts or liability terms independently.