What Verdica's 850 score means for CLIVER HAROLD L DBA
An 850 composite score places CLIVER HAROLD L DBA in Verdica's excellent band (800–850), the highest tier of compliance performance. This score reflects that the entity has maintained clean standing across all three measured dimensions—certificate validity, FAA enforcement history, and service difficulty reports—with no flagged issues in any category.
For a business owner or consumer evaluating this provider, an 850 score signals that regulatory data accessible to Verdica shows no active compliance concerns on record. The entity sits at the top percentile of aviation providers in terms of documented regulatory adherence. However, it is important to note that this score is composite and backward-looking; it reflects historical compliance data and the absence of recorded violations, not a guarantee of future performance or quality of service. No independent customer reviews have yet been indexed for this entity on Verdica's platform, so the score is based entirely on FAA regulatory records rather than operational feedback.
How the sub-scores break down
Certificate Standing: 850
This sub-score reflects the validity and good standing of CLIVER HAROLD L DBA's FAA airworthiness certificate or applicable operating certificate. A score of 850 indicates that the certificate is current, has no restrictions flagged in FAA records, and meets baseline regulatory eligibility. In the aviation industry, certificate standing is foundational; any lapse, suspension, or revocation would sharply reduce this sub-score. The perfect score here means the entity holds the appropriate airworthiness or operational authority required by the FAA and has maintained compliance with renewal and certification requirements.
FAA Enforcement: 850
This sub-score measures the entity's enforcement history—or absence thereof—recorded in FAA databases. An 850 indicates no recorded violations, citations, or enforcement actions on file with the FAA at the time Verdica indexed the data. In aviation, enforcement actions range from minor administrative warnings to significant penalties and certificate action. The absence of enforcement events is a key indicator of regulatory compliance, though it does not comment on the entity's internal safety culture or operational practices beyond what regulators have formally documented.
Service Difficulty Reports: 850
This sub-score reflects incident or defect reports filed with the FAA regarding the entity's products or services. An 850 indicates either no service difficulty reports on record or a historically low incidence of reported issues. Service difficulty data often comes from operators, maintenance personnel, and the public and can signal systemic problems, design flaws, or maintenance gaps. A high score in this dimension suggests the FAA has not received—or has received very few—complaints or incident reports tied to this provider's work or products.
What regulators in TX track for aviation providers
The FAA maintains centralized databases of airworthiness certificates, which authorize the design, production, and maintenance of aircraft and components. These certificates come in several forms: type certificates (for aircraft designs), production certificates, and repair station certificates, among others. Regulators track compliance through certificate renewal cycles, inspections, and audit findings.
Enforcement records capture violations of Federal Aviation Regulations (FARs), whether administrative, civil, or criminal. Common infractions include maintenance lapses, unauthorized modifications, inadequate record-keeping, and failure to comply with airworthiness directives. The FAA publishes enforcement actions to establish a public record of compliance violations.
Service Difficulty Reports (SDRs) are submitted through voluntary and mandatory reporting channels and document defects, failures, or unsafe conditions discovered during operation or maintenance. Patterns in SDRs can trigger AD (airworthiness directive) issuance or investigation.
Together, these data streams form a regulatory compliance profile visible to the public and used by Verdica to assign scores.
Bottom line
CLIVER HAROLD L DBA holds an excellent compliance profile based on available FAA regulatory data, with no recorded certificate violations, enforcement actions, or service difficulty reports. Anyone considering working with this provider should still independently verify current certificate status, request references, and review any contracts or service agreements, since the Verdica score reflects regulatory history, not customer satisfaction or operational reliability.