What Verdica's 850 score means for FRANKLIN ERIC J
FRANKLIN ERIC J holds a composite score of 850 out of 850, placing this entity in the excellent band (800–850). This score reflects the aggregated assessment across three compliance dimensions tracked by the FAA: Certificate Standing, FAA Enforcement history, and Service Difficulty Reports. All three sub-scores are maximal at 850, indicating no identified deficiencies across any measured compliance category.
A score in this range means the entity has demonstrated clean standing with federal aviation regulators in Alaska and shows no pattern of enforcement actions or airworthiness-related service difficulties on record. Readers should interpret this as a provider with a currently compliant regulatory profile. It is important to note that a high Verdica score reflects historical FAA data and does not constitute a guarantee of future performance or a substitute for your own due diligence. No independent customer reviews have been indexed yet, so this analysis is based solely on regulatory compliance metrics.
How the sub-scores break down
Certificate Standing (850/850): This sub-score reflects the status of FAA airworthiness certificates held by the entity. A maximum score indicates the entity holds valid, unrevoked certificates with no documented defects or limitations. In aviation, certificates are the foundational license to operate, and their standing directly correlates to legal operational authority. A certificate in good standing is a baseline regulatory requirement.
FAA Enforcement (850/850): This sub-score is derived from FAA enforcement records—formal actions such as citations, Compliance Orders, Special Emphasis Inspections, or certificate suspensions. A maximum score means no enforcement actions are recorded in the FAA's database for this entity. In the aviation industry, the absence of enforcement history typically indicates consistent adherence to operational and maintenance regulations, though it does not eliminate the possibility of isolated compliance gaps that have not yet been identified or formally acted upon.
Service Difficulty Reports (850/850): This sub-score reflects data from FAA Form 8010-4 submissions and similar airworthiness issue reports. A maximum score indicates no recurring or significant service difficulty patterns attributed to this entity's operations or maintenance practices. Service difficulties can signal systemic quality or maintenance issues; their absence is a positive indicator of operational reliability as measured by the FAA's defect-tracking system.
What regulators in AK track for aviation providers
The FAA maintains three primary datasets that feed into Verdica's scoring model for Alaska-based aviation providers:
Airworthiness Certificates document an entity's authorization to operate specific aircraft or provide maintenance services. The FAA issues, renews, and may suspend or revoke these certificates based on inspection results, compliance audits, and demonstrated adherence to operational standards. Certificate holders must undergo periodic recertification and comply with maintenance intervals, training requirements, and record-keeping protocols.
Enforcement Records capture formal regulatory actions taken when operators or service providers violate Federal Aviation Regulations (FARs). These can range from warning letters to certificate actions and may be triggered by accident investigations, inspector findings, or reported violations. Frequency and severity of enforcement actions are key indicators of regulatory relationships.
Service Difficulty Reports accumulate data on mechanical failures, unsafe conditions, and maintenance issues discovered during operation or inspection. Pattern analysis of these reports helps the FAA identify systemic problems and can prompt manufacturers, operators, or maintenance providers to take corrective action.
A provider's standing across these three dimensions reflects their compliance footprint as recorded by federal regulators—not their market reputation, pricing, or customer service responsiveness.
Bottom line
FRANKLIN ERIC J presents a clean regulatory profile with no identified deficiencies in FAA records. Anyone considering this provider should confirm current certificate status independently and supplement this compliance check with direct reference checks, service agreements, and independent customer feedback.