What Verdica's 850 score means for GOBER CHARLES K
GOBER CHARLES K has achieved Verdica's highest composite score of 850 out of 850, placing the entity in the "excellent" band (800–850). This score reflects performance across three regulatory dimensions tracked by the FAA: Certificate Standing, FAA Enforcement history, and Service Difficulty Reports. A score in this range indicates that the entity has maintained full compliance across all three measured areas and presents minimal regulatory risk based on publicly available FAA records.
For readers evaluating aviation service providers, an 850 score signals that Verdica's indexed data—which draws from FAA airworthiness certificates and enforcement records—shows no current red flags. This does not mean the provider has never had an issue; rather, it means that at the time of data collection, the FAA records reviewed showed no active violations, suspensions, or patterns of service difficulty that would lower the rating. The score is a snapshot of regulatory standing, not a lifetime assessment.
How the sub-scores break down
Certificate Standing: 850
This sub-score reflects the status of airworthiness certificates and related licensing credentials tracked by the FAA. A perfect score here means all certificates indexed are in good standing with no lapses, suspensions, or revocations recorded. In the aviation industry, certificate standing is fundamental—it's the FAA's confirmation that an entity meets minimum technical and operational requirements. When this score is high, it indicates the provider has satisfied renewal requirements, passed required inspections, and maintained the administrative compliance necessary to hold active certification.
FAA Enforcement: 850
This dimension measures the entity's history of regulatory actions by the FAA, including violations, civil penalties, or corrective directives. A perfect enforcement score means no enforcement actions are indexed in FAA records for this entity. In aviation, enforcement records can include anything from maintenance defects to operational violations or failure to comply with airworthiness directives. A clean enforcement record suggests the provider has not triggered formal FAA corrective action, though it does not guarantee zero technical issues—only that no documented violations meeting FAA enforcement thresholds appear in the indexed dataset.
Service Difficulty Reports: 850
Service Difficulty Reports (SDRs) are voluntary or mandatory reports filed when aviation equipment or services encounter problems that could affect safety or reliability. A perfect score means either no SDRs are indexed for this entity, or any indexed reports do not indicate systemic issues. High SDR scores are significant because they reflect real-world performance data beyond certificate compliance. They indicate customers and operators have not flagged recurring problems with the provider's services or products.
What regulators in OK track for aviation providers
The FAA maintains a public database of airworthiness certificates, which are required for most aviation operations and products. These certificates confirm that an entity or aircraft meets design, manufacturing, or operational standards. Certificate Standing scores reflect whether these credentials remain active and unrestricted.
FAA Enforcement actions include Notices of Violation, civil penalties, cease-and-desist orders, and suspension or revocation of certificates. These actions are triggered when an operator or service provider violates Federal Aviation Regulations. The FAA posts enforcement summaries publicly, and Verdica indexes these records to flag entities with documented compliance failures.
Service Difficulty Reports are filed by operators, maintenance technicians, and manufacturers when equipment malfunctions or services fail. While not all SDRs result in enforcement, patterns of reports can indicate systemic quality problems. Verdica monitors SDR frequency and severity to identify providers with higher-than-expected service issues.
Bottom line
GOBER CHARLES K's 850 composite score indicates excellent regulatory standing across all three FAA-tracked dimensions. This provider presents minimal risk based on indexed FAA certificate, enforcement, and service difficulty data. Anyone considering engagement should still verify current business credentials directly with the FAA and seek independent references, but the regulatory baseline is clean.