What Verdica's 850 score means for GORAL JAN
GORAL JAN in Oregon holds a perfect composite score of 850 out of 850, placing the entity in Verdica's highest performance band (800–850 = excellent). This score reflects an absence of regulatory friction across all three measured dimensions: certificate standing, FAA enforcement history, and service difficulty reports.
A score at this level indicates that, based on available FAA airworthiness certificates and enforcement records, there are no documented compliance gaps, violations, or operational red flags in the indexed data. For a business owner or consumer evaluating aviation providers, an 850 score signals that regulatory oversight has not identified material problems. That said, the score is built on absence of negative indicators rather than affirmative proof of operational excellence. No independent customer reviews are currently indexed for this entity, so the assessment is anchored entirely in regulator data.
Readers should understand that an 850 score does not constitute an endorsement or guarantee of quality or capability—it means the provider is operating within regulatory requirements as documented in FAA records. The strength of such a score lies in its transparency: it tells you that scrutiny by the Federal Aviation Administration has not raised compliance concerns significant enough to affect the entity's standing.
How the sub-scores break down
Certificate Standing (850/850): This sub-score reflects the current status of the entity's FAA airworthiness certificates and licensing credentials. A perfect score here means the entity holds the required certifications for its stated operations and has not allowed those certificates to lapse, become restricted, or face suspension. In aviation, certificate standing is binary in practice—a provider either maintains valid credentials or does not. A high score confirms the entity meets this baseline requirement.
FAA Enforcement (850/850): This dimension captures the entity's history of regulatory actions, violations, or penalties issued by the FAA. These can include citations, fines, or corrective action orders resulting from inspections or investigations. An 850 score indicates no material enforcement actions have been recorded in the FAA's enforcement databases that Verdica indexes. This suggests the provider has not triggered formal compliance investigations or sanctions during the period covered by the data.
Service Difficulty Reports (850/850): This sub-score is derived from FAA Service Difficulty Reports (SDRs)—voluntary and mandatory reports filed by operators and maintainers when aircraft or components experience unexpected failures, defects, or malfunctions. A high SDR score indicates either a low frequency of reported incidents or a pattern of incidents that do not suggest systemic quality problems. An 850 score suggests the entity has either had minimal SDR involvement or that any reports do not indicate recurring defects tied to the entity's operations or maintenance.
What regulators in OR track for aviation providers
The FAA maintains several compliance frameworks that affect aviation provider scores:
Airworthiness certificates confirm that aircraft, components, or systems meet design and maintenance standards. Violations might include operating equipment beyond approved parameters or failing required inspections.
Enforcement records document FAA responses to suspected violations of Federal Aviation Regulations (FARs). Common infractions include maintenance record deficiencies, improper certifications, unsafe operations, or failure to comply with airworthiness directives. Penalties range from warning letters to certificate revocation.
Service Difficulty Reports track in-service failures and help the FAA and industry identify emerging safety trends. High-frequency SDRs on a specific entity's aircraft or components can prompt investigations or service bulletins.
Oregon-specific oversight is handled through the FAA's Portland Flight Standards District Office and the FAA's Safety & Compliance Teams. These bodies conduct ramp checks, audits, and investigations that feed into enforcement and certificate records.
Bottom line
GORAL JAN meets or exceeds regulatory baselines across all measured compliance dimensions. Before engaging with this provider, verify that their certificate scope matches your operational needs and confirm insurance and safety protocols through direct inquiry—a strong regulator score is one data point, not a substitute for due diligence.