What Verdica's 850 score means for GWIN JEFFREY
GWIN JEFFREY holds a composite score of 850 out of 850, placing this entity in Verdica's excellent band (800–850). This score reflects the absence of material compliance issues across all tracked regulatory dimensions. The composite score is built on three equally weighted sub-dimensions: Certificate Standing, FAA Enforcement, and Service Difficulty Reports. When all three sub-scores are at their maximum value of 850, it indicates that the FAA has no active enforcement actions, no substantive airworthiness certificate suspensions or revocations, and no filed service difficulty reports attributable to this entity.
For a reader considering business engagement with GWIN JEFFREY, an 850 score signals low regulatory risk based on available FAA records. However, it is important to note that Verdica's score reflects only FAA-tracked data; it does not measure customer service quality, response times, pricing, or other operational factors. Additionally, no independent customer reviews are currently indexed for this entity, so the score should be cross-checked with direct customer references or other due diligence before making a final decision.
How the sub-scores break down
Certificate Standing (850): This sub-score reflects the status of all airworthiness certificates issued to or held by GWIN JEFFREY. A score of 850 indicates that no certificates are under suspension, revocation, or conditional approval. In the aviation industry, airworthiness certificates are foundational—they authorize an operator or maintainer to conduct specific aviation activities. A high score here means the entity maintains good standing with regulators on its core licensing credentials.
FAA Enforcement (850): This dimension tracks civil penalties, warnings, and formal enforcement actions issued by the Federal Aviation Administration. A maximum score of 850 indicates no active or recent enforcement records. Low or declining scores in this dimension typically suggest violations such as maintenance procedure deviations, operational rule breaches, or documentation failures. The absence of enforcement history, as reflected here, indicates compliance with FAA regulations as measured by the agency's oversight activities.
Service Difficulty Reports (850): Service Difficulty Reports (SDRs) are filed by pilots, mechanics, and operators when they encounter defects or anomalies in aircraft or systems. A score of 850 indicates no SDRs have been filed against GWIN JEFFREY, or that any filed reports do not reflect patterns of systemic quality issues. High SDR counts or recurring failure patterns would lower this score, signaling potential reliability concerns. The maximum score here suggests minimal reported field defects or service problems.
What regulators in OK track for aviation providers
The FAA maintains a public registry of airworthiness certificates and enforcement records for all aviation providers operating in Oklahoma and nationwide. Certificate Standing is monitored through the FAA's airworthiness database, which tracks issuance, renewal, suspension, and revocation of certificates for operators, maintainers, and other authorized entities. Enforcement records are maintained through the FAA's administrative and civil penalty systems; violations can include rule deviations in maintenance, operations, training, or record-keeping.
Service Difficulty Reports are filed through the FAA's Aviation Safety Reporting System (ASRS) and manufacturer channels. These reports create a historical record of field issues, safety events, and defect patterns. Regulators use this data to identify systemic problems that might warrant an airworthiness directive or heightened inspection.
An entity's score can decline if certificates are not renewed, if enforcement actions are initiated for rule violations, or if SDRs accumulate and reveal recurring defects. Conversely, consistent compliance over time—no penalties, active licenses, and minimal defect reports—produces high scores.
Bottom line
GWIN JEFFREY's 850 composite score reflects clean regulatory standing across all FAA-tracked dimensions. This entity presents low regulatory risk based on available data. Before committing to a business relationship, verify current certificate status directly with the FAA and solicit references from current or past customers, since customer reviews are not yet available on this page.