What Verdica's 850 score means for HARRIS CHAD A
HARRIS CHAD A holds a composite Verdica score of 850 out of 850, placing the entity in the excellent band (800–850). This score reflects the absence of recorded compliance issues across three regulatory dimensions tracked by the FAA: certificate standing, enforcement history, and service difficulty reports.
A score at this level indicates that available FAA records show no active licensing deficiencies, no enforcement actions, and no pattern of reported airworthiness or maintenance difficulties. For readers evaluating aviation providers, an 850 score signals that regulatory oversight has not surfaced documented problems. This does not constitute a guarantee of service quality or safety performance beyond the FAA's administrative oversight—it reflects only what appears in federal airworthiness certificates and enforcement databases.
The absence of independent customer reviews in Verdica's index means this score is based entirely on regulatory data, not user experience. Prospective customers should treat the 850 as one input in their decision-making process, not a complete picture of operational capability or customer satisfaction.
How the sub-scores break down
Certificate Standing: 850
This sub-score reflects the status of FAA airworthiness certificates and operating licenses held by HARRIS CHAD A. A perfect score in this dimension indicates no lapsed, suspended, revoked, or restricted certificates on record. In aviation, certificate standing is the baseline measure of regulatory authorization; providers without valid certificates cannot legally operate. A score of 850 means Verdica's review of FAA certificate databases found no adverse changes or compliance holds.
FAA Enforcement: 850
This sub-score aggregates FAA enforcement actions—citations, civil penalties, cease-and-desist orders, and similar regulatory interventions. A perfect score indicates no recorded enforcement history in FAA databases. In the aviation industry, enforcement actions typically arise from violations of operating standards, maintenance protocols, or airworthiness directives. Providers with clean enforcement records have not triggered documented regulatory intervention at the federal level.
Service Difficulty Reports: 850
This sub-score measures airworthiness service difficulty reports (SDRs) and similar quality-indicator submissions to the FAA. A perfect score suggests either no reported difficulties or a clean historical pattern. SDRs are filed by operators and maintenance providers when aircraft or components exhibit unexpected behavior or defects. A high score here suggests minimal documented instances of defects, failures, or maintenance complications that would warrant FAA reporting.
What regulators in AL track for aviation providers
Alabama aviation providers operate under FAA oversight regardless of state location. The FAA maintains three primary databases Verdica consults:
-
Airworthiness Certificates: FAA records all valid aircraft registration, maintenance certifications, and operating permits. Certificates can be suspended or revoked for non-compliance with maintenance standards, safety directives, or operational rules.
-
Enforcement Records: The FAA issues citations and penalties for violations including improper maintenance, falsification of records, failure to comply with airworthiness directives, and unsafe operations. These actions are public and tracked by provider and certificate holder.
-
Service Difficulty Reports: Operators and maintenance facilities file SDRs when components fail unexpectedly or defects emerge. The FAA aggregates these to identify systemic safety trends. A provider with frequent SDRs may indicate maintenance, quality control, or component sourcing issues.
Scores improve when records remain clean across these three areas. Scores decline when certificates are downgraded, enforcement actions are issued, or SDR patterns emerge.
Bottom line
HARRIS CHAD A's 850 score places this provider in the top regulatory compliance tier based on available FAA records. Before committing to a partnership or transaction, verify that the entity's specific certifications align with your aviation needs, and consider requesting independent references from existing clients to supplement the regulatory baseline.