What Verdica's 850 score means for KILGORE SHAWN K
KILGORE SHAWN K holds a composite Verdica score of 850 out of 850, placing the entity in the "excellent" band (800–850). This score reflects performance across three regulatory dimensions tracked by the FAA: certificate standing, enforcement history, and service difficulty reports. A perfect or near-perfect score in this range indicates that an entity has no material compliance gaps visible in federal airworthiness and enforcement records. For a business owner or consumer evaluating aviation providers, a score of 850 signals that available regulatory data shows no red flags—the provider meets baseline safety and certification requirements and has not accumulated enforcement actions or widespread service issues flagged to the FAA. Readers should understand that this score reflects regulatory compliance standing, not customer satisfaction, operational efficiency, or market reputation. No independent customer reviews have been indexed yet, so this analysis is confined to what FAA records show.
How the sub-scores break down
Certificate Standing: 850
This sub-score reflects the status of FAA airworthiness certificates held by the entity. A perfect 850 indicates that all relevant certificates are current and in good standing. In aviation, certificates govern the right to operate, maintain, or service aircraft and components. A high score here means the provider has met initial qualification standards and is not under certificate suspension, revocation, or conditional status. This is a baseline threshold; all active aviation providers must maintain valid certificates, so a perfect score confirms the entity meets that floor.
FAA Enforcement: 850
This dimension tracks regulatory enforcement actions—violations, warnings, civil penalties, or compliance orders issued by the FAA. An 850 score indicates no significant enforcement history visible in federal records. In the aviation industry, enforcement actions typically arise from deviations from Federal Aviation Regulations (FARs), maintenance lapses, or unsafe practices. Enforcement can range from minor citations to certificate revocation. A high score here suggests the provider has not accumulated a pattern of violations or received formal corrective action notices.
Service Difficulty Reports: 850
Service Difficulty Reports (SDRs) are voluntary submissions by operators, maintenance personnel, and service providers documenting mechanical, maintenance, or operational anomalies. The FAA uses SDRs to track recurring issues and identify systemic problems. A high score in this category suggests either no pattern of reported difficulties linked to this entity or a very low frequency of reported issues. This metric can indicate service quality and attention to detail, though it depends on the volume and nature of work performed.
What regulators in TX track for aviation providers
The FAA maintains public databases of airworthiness certificates (which authorize operation of specific aircraft and maintenance of components), enforcement actions, and Service Difficulty Reports. For aviation providers operating in Texas, compliance hinges on holding valid certificates appropriate to their function—whether that is aircraft operation, maintenance, repair, or component overhaul. Violations that would lower an enforcement score include non-compliance with maintenance standards (FAR Part 43), unsafe maintenance practices, inadequate record-keeping, and operation of aircraft outside approved parameters. The FAA issues violations ranging from warnings to monetary penalties to certificate revocation. Service Difficulty Reports create a searchable record of problems reported by industry personnel; repeated reports on a provider's work can trigger FAA investigation. A provider's score improves through maintaining current certifications and avoiding formal enforcement and a pattern of reported difficulties.
Bottom line
KILGORE SHAWN K presents an excellent regulatory profile with no visible compliance gaps in FAA records. Anyone considering engaging this provider should verify that services needed align with the entity's certificate scope and should cross-check references or past customer experience independently, since the Verdica score reflects regulatory standing only, not service quality or reputation metrics.