What Verdica's 850 score means for MCCARTAN GARY M
MCCARTAN GARY M has achieved a perfect composite score of 850 out of 850, placing this entity in Verdica's excellent band (800–850). This score reflects the absence of significant compliance red flags across all measured dimensions of aviation provider standing.
An 850 score does not necessarily mean perfection in absolute terms—it means that based on available FAA airworthiness certificate data and enforcement records, there are no material issues flagged in the regulatory record. For someone evaluating this provider, an excellent-band score indicates low regulatory risk as measured by the FAA's public records. No customer reviews are currently indexed, so this assessment is based solely on regulatory data; prospective clients should still conduct their own due diligence, including references and service history checks.
How the sub-scores break down
Certificate Standing: 850
This sub-score reflects the status and validity of FAA airworthiness certificates held by this entity. A score of 850 in this dimension indicates that any certificates are current and in good standing with no suspensions, revocations, or administrative encumbrances on record. In aviation, certificate standing is a foundational compliance measure; lapses or restrictions here directly signal regulatory concern.
FAA Enforcement: 850
This sub-score aggregates the FAA's enforcement action record against the entity. A perfect 850 means no recorded enforcement actions, violations, or penalties are indexed in the FAA's public enforcement database. Aviation enforcement actions can range from minor violations (e.g., maintenance logging discrepancies) to serious infractions (airworthiness defects, unsafe practices). The absence of such actions suggests adherence to applicable FAA regulations during the period covered by available records.
Service Difficulty Reports: 850
This sub-score is derived from FAA Service Difficulty Report (SDR) data. SDRs are filed by operators and maintainers to document technical problems, component failures, or safety anomalies. A score of 850 indicates either no SDRs on file or an SDR pattern that does not suggest systemic problems. A lower score in this dimension would typically reflect recurring technical issues or safety-related reports that suggest quality or maintenance concerns.
What regulators in IA track for aviation providers
The FAA oversees aviation providers through multiple accountability mechanisms relevant to Verdica's scoring:
Airworthiness Certificates form the legal basis for aircraft operation. The FAA issues and maintains these certificates; they can be standard, special, experimental, or limited in scope. Certificate status—whether active, suspended, or revoked—is a core compliance indicator.
Enforcement Records document FAA actions taken against regulated entities for non-compliance. These can include violations of Federal Aviation Regulations (FARs), failure to meet maintenance standards, unsafe operational practices, or defects in design or manufacturing. Enforcement severity ranges from warning notices to civil penalties and certificate revocation.
Service Difficulty Reports are a grassroots safety reporting mechanism. Operators, pilots, and maintenance technicians file SDRs when they encounter recurring or serious technical defects. The FAA analyzes SDR patterns to identify emerging safety risks and can mandate corrective actions across fleets or manufacturers if a trend emerges.
In Iowa, these FAA records are the primary public data source for assessing aviation provider compliance. State-level oversight is limited; the FAA maintains national jurisdiction over airworthiness and safety.
Bottom line
With a perfect composite score of 850 and no enforcement or certificate issues on record, MCCARTAN GARY M presents low regulatory risk based on available FAA data. Anyone considering engagement should verify current certificate status independently, request service references, and review any operational history not captured in federal enforcement records.