What Verdica's 850 score means for NORTHSTAR AEROSPRAY INC
NORTHSTAR AEROSPRAY INC has achieved a composite score of 850 out of 850, placing it in Verdica's highest performance band (800–850), which indicates excellent compliance standing. This score reflects that the entity has maintained current FAA airworthiness certificates, has no substantive FAA enforcement actions on record, and has not accumulated service difficulty reports that would indicate systemic operational or maintenance issues.
A score in this band means the provider has met or exceeded regulatory baseline requirements across all three measured dimensions. For a business owner or procurement officer evaluating aviation service providers, this score suggests that from a compliance and regulatory perspective—the areas tracked by federal authorities—this entity presents a low regulatory risk profile. However, readers should understand that this score measures regulatory compliance only; it does not evaluate pricing, customer service quality, or operational speed. No independent customer reviews are currently indexed in Verdica's system for this entity, so compliance data should be considered alongside direct reference checks if you are making a high-stakes contracting decision.
How the sub-scores break down
Certificate Standing (850 / 850): This sub-score reflects the currency and validity of FAA airworthiness certificates held by the entity. A perfect score indicates that all required certificates are active and in good standing with the Federal Aviation Administration. In aviation services, certificate standing is a threshold compliance requirement; providers cannot legally operate certain functions without current certification. A score of 850 here means there are no lapses, suspensions, or outstanding deficiency notices on file.
FAA Enforcement (850 / 850): This dimension tracks formal enforcement actions issued by the FAA—including violations, civil penalties, cease-and-desist orders, and other regulatory sanctions. A score of 850 indicates no material enforcement history in the FAA database. In the aviation industry, enforcement typically results from documented safety violations, maintenance lapses, airworthiness infractions, or operational deviations. The absence of enforcement records suggests the entity has not been formally cited for regulatory breaches by federal authorities.
Service Difficulty Reports (850 / 850): This sub-score aggregates data from FAA Service Difficulty Reports (SDRs), which are filed by mechanics, operators, and manufacturers when they discover defects, malfunctions, or unsafe conditions in aircraft or components. A perfect score here indicates either no SDRs have been filed against this entity or the reports filed do not indicate a pattern of systemic quality or safety issues. For an aerospray operation, this would suggest that aircraft serviced or components supplied have not generated a notable track record of defect complaints in the federal database.
What regulators in MN track for aviation providers
The FAA oversees aviation service providers through multiple regulatory channels. Airworthiness certificates—the foundation of Certificate Standing scores—are granted to entities that meet specific operational and maintenance standards. These certificates can be suspended or revoked if an entity fails inspections, violates maintenance protocols, or operates outside its approved scope.
Enforcement actions are issued when the FAA documents violations of Federal Aviation Regulations (FARs). Common infractions include maintenance discrepancies, improper repairs, inadequate record-keeping, or operations beyond certificate authority. Penalties range from warning letters to civil fines and certificate revocation.
Service Difficulty Reports are filed voluntarily (and sometimes mandatorily) by industry participants to create a federal database of recurring aircraft and component problems. The FAA uses SDR trends to identify unsafe conditions, issue airworthiness directives, and track whether specific providers or manufacturers are generating disproportionate defect reports.
Verdica's scoring model weights these three categories equally, reflecting the FAA's view that certificate compliance, enforcement history, and operational quality indicators are all essential to assessing regulatory risk.
Bottom line
NORTHSTAR AEROSPRAY INC presents an excellent regulatory compliance profile based on FAA data. Before contracting, verify current certificate details directly with the FAA, request references from recent clients, and confirm the scope of services matches your operational needs.