What Verdica's 850 score means for ORTWEIN MATHEW M
ORTWEIN MATHEW M holds a perfect composite score of 850 out of 850, placing this entity in Verdica's excellent band (800–850). This score reflects an absence of red flags across the regulatory dimensions Verdica monitors: FAA airworthiness certificate standing, FAA enforcement history, and service difficulty reports. A score in this range indicates that public records show no current compliance concerns, no active enforcement actions, and no pattern of maintenance or operational difficulties flagged through the FAA's Service Difficulty Reporting program.
Readers should interpret an 850 score as the baseline for regulatory compliance—the entity meets all current licensing and airworthiness requirements and has not generated documented enforcement or safety event records in the FAA databases Verdica indexes. This does not constitute a guarantee of service quality, safety culture, or business reliability beyond regulatory compliance. It means the entity presents no detectable compliance risk based on the federal records available. No independent customer reviews are currently indexed for this provider, so this score is regulatory-only and should be weighed alongside direct references, interviews, or operational audits if the reader intends to establish a business relationship.
How the sub-scores break down
Certificate Standing: 850
This sub-score reflects the status of airworthiness certificates and current licensing maintained by this entity. A perfect 850 indicates all certificates are active and in good standing with no suspensions, revocations, or administrative holds. In aviation, certificate standing is the foundation of regulatory permission to operate. A low score in this dimension would signal expired, suspended, or revoked authorizations.
FAA Enforcement: 850
This sub-score aggregates FAA enforcement actions, violations, and penalties on record. A perfect 850 means no active or historical enforcement actions are indexed. In aviation, enforcement records range from minor compliance notices to civil penalties and airworthiness directives. A high score here signals an absence of documented violations; a low score would indicate patterns of non-compliance, accidents, or regulatory breaches that warranted FAA intervention.
Service Difficulty Reports: 850
This sub-score reflects submitted Service Difficulty Reports (SDRs)—a voluntary FAA reporting system through which mechanics, operators, and manufacturers flag maintenance anomalies, recurring failures, or design issues. A perfect 850 indicates no (or no material) adverse SDRs associated with this entity. Low scores in this dimension can signal recurring mechanical problems, maintenance quality issues, or operational difficulties that other pilots or mechanics have formally reported. SDRs are non-punitive and focus on equipment and procedural trend identification.
What regulators in OR track for aviation providers
The FAA maintains airworthiness certificates for aircraft and airmen (pilots, mechanics, and other certified personnel) across all 50 states, including Oregon. Verdica indexes these records to determine whether certificates remain valid, current, and unencumbered. Airworthiness certificates are renewed through compliance with recurrent training, medical certifications, and proficiency standards—failure to meet these triggers suspension or revocation.
FAA enforcement records document violations discovered through inspections, accident investigations, or compliance audits. Common infractions include maintenance record discrepancies, operating outside certificate limitations, training deficiencies, and failure to comply with airworthiness directives. Penalties range from warning notices to civil fines and certificate revocation.
Service Difficulty Reports provide a voluntary, non-punitive feedback channel. The FAA and industry use SDR trend data to identify unsafe conditions, design flaws, or maintenance training gaps. Unlike enforcement, SDRs do not penalize the reporter and are used for systemic safety improvement. High SDR counts for a particular entity or aircraft type signal recurring technical or procedural problems.
Bottom line
ORTWEIN MATHEW M presents no regulatory compliance risk based on FAA records indexed by Verdica. Before entering a business relationship, cross-check current references from other operators or customers, confirm specific services and scope in writing, and verify that the entity's certificate type matches your operational needs.