What Verdica's 850 score means for PAQUIN MICHAEL A
PAQUIN MICHAEL A holds a composite compliance score of 850 out of 850, placing the entity in Verdica's highest performance band (800–850 = excellent). This perfect score reflects clean standing across all three regulatory dimensions tracked: Certificate Standing, FAA Enforcement, and Service Difficulty Reports.
For someone evaluating this aviation provider, an 850 score signals that available FAA records show no current licensing deficiencies, no enforcement actions, and no flagged service difficulty patterns. This does not mean the provider has never had a minor issue or undergone routine inspection; rather, it means that as of the data snapshot, the FAA's public airworthiness and enforcement databases contain no active or recent compliance concerns that would lower the score.
Readers should interpret this as a baseline of regulatory compliance, not a guarantee of service quality or outcome. No independent customer reviews are indexed yet, so this score reflects regulator-side data only. A prospective client would be reasonable to treat an 850 score as a clear green light on the compliance front, but should still conduct other due diligence—such as requesting references, verifying insurance, or reviewing service agreements—before engaging.
How the sub-scores break down
Certificate Standing (850): This sub-score reflects the status of FAA airworthiness certificates held by or issued to this entity. A perfect 850 means no current suspensions, revocations, or lapses in required certifications appear in FAA records. In the aviation industry, certificate standing is the foundation of legal operation; any gap or downgrade would immediately flag a compliance concern.
FAA Enforcement (850): This sub-score aggregates enforcement actions recorded against the entity in FAA databases. Possible enforcement outcomes include warnings, civil penalties, certificate action, or mandatory corrective actions. A score of 850 indicates no active enforcement history flagged in publicly available FAA records. This does not preclude minor inspection findings or corrective notices that may not rise to formal enforcement; it means no formal enforcement case is associated with this entity.
Service Difficulty Reports (850): This sub-score tracks reports filed under FAA Part 43 (Maintenance, Preventive Maintenance, Rebuilding, and Alteration) and related mechanisms by which maintenance shops, repair stations, and service providers report safety-related defects or anomalies. A perfect 850 suggests either no flagged service difficulty reports exist on record, or any reports filed do not indicate a pattern of non-compliance. High scores in this dimension are significant in aviation because they suggest operational rigor and hazard reporting integrity.
What regulators in NH track for aviation providers
The FAA maintains several databases that inform Verdica's scoring model. Airworthiness Certificates verify that an entity holds current authorization to conduct specific work (e.g., maintenance, repair, or aircraft operation) and has not been subject to suspension or revocation. Enforcement Records capture formal FAA actions, including civil penalties under 14 CFR Part 13, certificate denials or revocations, and cease-and-desist orders.
Service Difficulty Reports are safety reports filed when maintenance or service providers discover defects or hazardous conditions. These reports, logged in the FAA's Safety Data Integration system, form a quality and safety pattern indicator. Recurring or serious reports would typically degrade an entity's score; their absence suggests either low defect discovery rates or effective corrective action.
In New Hampshire specifically, aviation providers are subject to FAA oversight regardless of state; there is no separate state aviation authority that supersedes FAA jurisdiction. Compliance focus typically centers on maintenance records, certificate renewal, and incident reporting.
Bottom line
PAQUIN MICHAEL A presents a clean compliance profile by FAA standards, with no active regulatory concerns visible in public records. Anyone considering this provider should treat the 850 score as a positive regulatory foundation, but should independently verify insurance status, references, and service scope before committing to work.