What Verdica's 850 score means for REEVES FIGUEROA MARION RICHARD
An 850 composite score places REEVES FIGUEROA MARION RICHARD in Verdica's excellent band (800–850), the highest performance tier. This score reflects clean standing across all three regulatory dimensions tracked by Verdica: Certificate Standing, FAA Enforcement, and Service Difficulty Reports.
For a reader evaluating this provider, an 850 score signals that available FAA records show no current enforcement actions, no airworthiness certificate suspensions or revocations, and no pattern of service difficulty reports that would flag safety or compliance concerns. It does not mean the provider has never had a minor issue or training event; rather, it indicates that as of the data refresh, their regulatory footprint is unencumbered by active violations or serious historical patterns. This places them in the top tier of providers tracked in the FAA database.
That said, the absence of independent customer reviews means Verdica cannot yet triangulate regulatory standing with real-world user experience. An excellent compliance score and no customer feedback should not be read as a seal of universal approval—only as confirmation that federal records show no red flags.
How the sub-scores break down
Certificate Standing (850). This sub-score reflects the status of REEVES FIGUEROA MARION RICHARD's FAA airworthiness certificates and any related licensing credentials. An 850 here means no current suspensions, revocations, or restrictions on record. In aviation, certificate standing is foundational: it confirms the provider is legally authorized to operate or maintain aircraft in their rated category. A lower score in this dimension would suggest lapsed credentials, active restrictions, or a history of certificate action by the FAA.
FAA Enforcement (850). This dimension captures the provider's history under FAA enforcement mechanisms, including formal legal actions, civil penalties, or corrective action notices. An 850 indicates no recorded enforcement proceedings or an exceptionally clean enforcement history. In the aviation industry, enforcement records are a direct proxy for regulatory compliance: they show whether an operator has been cited for violations of airworthiness rules, maintenance protocols, or operational standards. A lower score would reflect open or recent enforcement cases.
Service Difficulty Reports (850). These are mandatory FAA reports filed by operators, maintainers, and manufacturers when aircraft or components experience issues that affect safety or airworthiness. An 850 suggests either no reported service difficulties attributed to this provider or a pattern of reporting that does not raise systemic safety concerns. A lower score in this category can indicate a history of recurring technical problems, maintenance oversights, or component failures tied to the provider's work.
What regulators in NH track for aviation providers
The FAA maintains a public registry of airworthiness certificates, enforcement actions, and service difficulty reports that Verdica uses as its underlying data source. In New Hampshire, as across the U.S., this includes:
- Airworthiness Certificates: FAA-issued authorizations for aircraft, engines, and propellers. The FAA can suspend or revoke these if an operator fails inspection, maintenance, or safety standards.
- Enforcement Records: Formal FAA actions including Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM), Airworthiness Directives, civil penalties, or emergency orders. These escalate with severity of non-compliance.
- Service Difficulty Reports (SDR): Standardized forms (FAA Form 1686) filed by service providers, operators, and manufacturers documenting mechanical, structural, or performance anomalies. The FAA tracks patterns to identify systemic risk.
Scores rise with clean records and fall when violations, failed inspections, or recurring SDRs accumulate. The FAA updates these databases continuously; Verdica's data reflects the most recent public snapshot.
Bottom line
REEVES FIGUEROA MARION RICHARD holds an excellent regulatory profile with no active FAA enforcement, certificate issues, or service difficulty patterns on record. Anyone considering engagement should verify current certificate status independently and note that regulatory standing does not substitute for direct reference checks or service-level agreements.