What Verdica's 850 score means for REIMAN EDWARD T
Reiman Edward T holds a composite compliance score of 850 out of 850—the maximum possible rating in Verdica's assessment framework. This places the entity in the "excellent" band (800–850), the highest tier of regulatory standing.
A perfect or near-perfect score indicates that across all measured dimensions of FAA oversight, no negative enforcement actions, airworthiness certificate suspensions, or service difficulty reports have been recorded in the data sources Verdica indexes. For aviation providers, this means regulators have not documented compliance gaps or safety concerns in their official records.
Readers should understand what this score reflects: it is a snapshot of regulatory compliance history, not a guarantee of service quality, customer experience, or operational capacity. No independent customer reviews are yet indexed for this entity, so the score captures only what FAA administrative records show. A high Verdica score is a necessary baseline indicator but should be one of several factors in a business decision. You should still verify licensing status directly with the FAA, check references, and confirm the scope of work or services offered matches your needs.
How the sub-scores break down
Certificate Standing: 850
This sub-score reflects the status of the entity's FAA airworthiness certificates or relevant operating licenses. A maximum score here means no active suspensions, revocations, or restrictions appear in FAA records. For aviation maintenance technicians, repair stations, or other certificate holders, this indicates their credential remains valid and unencumbered by regulatory action.
FAA Enforcement: 850
The enforcement sub-score measures the absence of civil penalties, warnings, or violations issued by the FAA. A perfect score means no formal enforcement records—such as Notice of Proposed Amendments (NPAs), civil penalties, or compliance orders—are associated with this entity in FAA databases. In aviation, enforcement actions typically arise from maintenance defects, non-compliance with operating procedures, or failure to meet safety standards.
Service Difficulty Reports: 850
Service Difficulty Reports (SDRs) are safety documents submitted to the FAA when aircraft components, systems, or maintenance procedures result in unsafe conditions or failures. A maximum score here indicates no substantiated SDRs linked to this entity. A low score in this dimension would suggest a pattern of safety issues or quality problems documented by operators or mechanics.
What regulators in NY track for aviation providers
The FAA oversees aviation safety through multiple compliance mechanisms. Airworthiness certificates establish that an aircraft, component, or service meets federal safety standards. Maintenance technicians and repair stations must hold valid certificates to legally perform work; lapses or revocations signal regulatory concern.
Enforcement records document violations such as:
- Failure to follow maintenance procedures or inspection protocols
- Issuance of defective components or non-compliant repairs
- Undisclosed safety risks or negligent work
Civil penalties may be imposed for regulatory breaches. Service Difficulty Reports create a historical record of in-service failures or defects; patterns in SDRs can trigger mandatory corrective action or rulemaking.
In New York, as in all states, aviation providers operate under the same federal FAA regulatory framework. State-level licensing may apply to certain roles, but FAA oversight is uniform. The score reflects whether that federal oversight has documented any gaps.
Bottom line
Reiman Edward T's perfect 850 score indicates no negative FAA compliance history on record. This is a strong regulatory baseline. However, before engaging this provider, confirm current certifications directly with the FAA, request references from other clients, and verify that their services align with your specific aviation needs. No customer reviews are yet indexed, so direct due diligence remains essential.