What Verdica's 850 score means for ROEHRIG MICHAEL A
ROEHRIG MICHAEL A holds a perfect composite score of 850 out of 850, placing the entity in Verdica's "excellent" band (800–850). This score reflects a compliance profile with no identified gaps across the three dimensions Verdica monitors: certificate standing, FAA enforcement history, and service difficulty reports.
For a reader evaluating this provider, an 850 score indicates that available FAA records show no active enforcement actions, no airworthiness certificate suspensions or revocations, and no pattern of service difficulty reports. This does not mean the provider has never faced a minor issue or conducted zero maintenance; rather, it means no significant regulatory red flags appear in the FAA databases Verdica indexes. The score is data-driven and regulator-sourced, not based on marketing claims or customer testimonials. No independent customer reviews are indexed yet, so this score reflects only compliance standing, not user experience.
An excellent-band score suggests the entity meets baseline regulatory requirements and maintains good standing with federal oversight. It is a starting point for due diligence, not a guarantee of service quality or fit for a specific use case.
How the sub-scores break down
Certificate Standing: 850 This sub-score reflects the status of the entity's FAA airworthiness certificates and related credentials. A perfect score means all certificates are current, active, and free from restrictions or limitations noted in FAA records. In aviation, certificate standing is binary in most cases—a certificate either is valid or is not. An 850 here signals no lapsed licensing, no conditional approvals, and no open compliance directives tied to certificate renewal.
FAA Enforcement: 850 This dimension tracks the entity's enforcement history with the Federal Aviation Administration. Enforcement actions can include formal warnings, civil penalties, certificate revocation, or suspension. An 850 score means Verdica's indexed FAA enforcement records contain no active or recent violations attributed to this entity. This is the strongest possible position in the enforcement dimension; a lower score would indicate one or more documented violations or ongoing regulatory disputes.
Service Difficulty Reports: 850 Service Difficulty Reports (SDRs) are mandatory filings submitted by pilots, mechanics, and operators to the FAA when they encounter safety-related problems with aircraft, systems, or maintenance work. A high SDR score does not mean zero reports were ever filed; rather, it means Verdica's review of available SDR data does not reveal a concentration or severity pattern that would raise a flag. An 850 indicates no pattern of recurring issues, no critical safety reports, or no trend suggesting systemic service problems.
What regulators in NY track for aviation providers
The FAA maintains a comprehensive database of airworthiness certificates, which are issued to aircraft, engines, propellers, and certain components. These certificates confirm an asset meets minimum safety and performance standards. Revocation or suspension of a certificate is a serious regulatory action, typically triggered by undisclosed damage, unresolved defects, or repeated maintenance lapses.
FAA enforcement records document violations of federal aviation regulations (FARs). Violations can result from improper maintenance procedures, inadequate record-keeping, failure to comply with airworthiness directives, or safety protocol breaches. Penalties range from formal warnings to fines to certificate action.
Service Difficulty Reports submitted in New York and nationwide feed into a searchable FAA database. While individual SDRs are not necessarily violations, patterns of SDRs—especially for the same issue across multiple aircraft or repeated occurrences—can trigger FAA investigation and enforcement action. Regulators use SDR trends to identify systemic risks.
Verdica synthesizes these three data streams to create a single compliance score. A provider scoring in the excellent band has cleared these regulatory checkpoints; a provider in the high-risk band would have active violations, certificate actions, or documented service problems.
Bottom line
ROEHRIG MICHAEL A presents an excellent compliance profile with no identified gaps in FAA records. Before engaging, verify that the provider's certificates and qualifications match your specific aviation need, and confirm insurance and operational scope independently—a high Verdica score covers regulatory standing, not suitability for your particular project.