What Verdica's 850 score means for SNIDER SAMUEL
SNIDER SAMUEL holds a composite score of 850 out of 850, placing the entity in Verdica's "excellent" band (800–850). This score reflects consistently strong performance across all measured compliance dimensions tracked by the FAA. For readers evaluating this provider, an 850 score indicates no material red flags in certificate standing, regulatory enforcement history, or service difficulty patterns within the indexed FAA dataset.
The score should be understood as a snapshot of regulatory standing, not a guarantee of service quality or business viability. It means SNIDER SAMUEL has maintained clean FAA records across the data sources Verdica monitors. No independent customer reviews are currently indexed, so this score reflects regulator data only. A business owner or consumer considering engagement with this provider should treat the 850 as one input in a broader due-diligence process—particularly if service experience, pricing, or operational fit are decision factors.
How the sub-scores break down
Certificate Standing: 850
This sub-score reflects the airworthiness and licensing status of the entity within FAA records. A perfect 850 indicates that SNIDER SAMUEL holds current, valid certifications appropriate to its aviation operations, with no lapsed, suspended, or revoked certificates on file. In the aviation industry, certificate standing is foundational; any gap or downgrade here signals regulatory concern and typically drives composite scores lower significantly.
FAA Enforcement: 850
This dimension tracks formal enforcement actions initiated by the FAA—including citations, warning letters, consent orders, or suspensions. An 850 score means no material enforcement history is indexed. The absence of enforcement actions is notable because even minor infractions (procedural violations, paperwork deficiencies, or maintenance lapses) can trigger FAA correspondence that appears in this record. A clean enforcement record suggests consistent adherence to operational and reporting requirements.
Service Difficulty Reports: 850
Service Difficulty Reports (SDRs) are submitted to the FAA when aviation equipment, components, or services exhibit defects, malfunctions, or failures. An 850 here indicates either no SDRs filed against SNIDER SAMUEL or only routine, non-systemic reports within normal industry ranges. High SDR counts can signal quality control, maintenance, or design issues. The perfect score suggests either minimal service volume or strong quality management practices—the data alone does not distinguish between them.
What regulators in UT track for aviation providers
The FAA maintains three primary data streams that feed compliance scoring for aviation providers:
Airworthiness Certificates document the regulatory authorization to operate. The FAA issues different certificate types based on entity class (e.g., maintenance repair organizations, parts manufacturers, or operators). Certificates require renewal, ongoing compliance audits, and adherence to technical standards. Certificate downgrade or revocation occurs when violations are substantiated—for example, failure to maintain required personnel qualifications, unsafe maintenance practices, or falsified records.
Enforcement Records capture the FAA's formal responses to non-compliance. Infractions can range from minor paperwork delays to serious safety violations. The FAA issues letters of investigation, establishes corrective action plans, and may levy civil penalties. Repeat violations or safety-critical lapses result in certificate action or operational restrictions.
Service Difficulty Reports are a required reporting mechanism for equipment defects discovered during maintenance or operation. Patterns in SDRs (e.g., recurring failures in a specific component) prompt FAA investigation and may trigger a manufacturer or service provider review. High SDR frequency for a given provider can lead to enforcement if root cause analysis reveals quality or process failures.
Utah's aviation providers operate under the same FAA oversight framework as all U.S. entities; state-level licensing or additional regulatory bodies may apply depending on the specific service type.
Bottom line
SNIDER SAMUEL's 850 score reflects clean regulatory standing across FAA certificate, enforcement, and service difficulty data. This is a strong score and suggests low regulatory risk. Anyone considering this provider should verify current business operations, cross-check service references, and confirm that scope of work aligns with the entity's certified capabilities.