What Verdica's 850 score means for SPITLER JOHN
SPITLER JOHN holds Verdica's highest composite score of 850 out of 850, placing the entity in the "excellent" band (800–850). This score reflects a clean record across all three regulatory dimensions tracked by Verdica: Certificate Standing, FAA Enforcement, and Service Difficulty Reports.
A perfect or near-perfect score in this range signals that an aviation provider has maintained full compliance with FAA airworthiness certification requirements, has no record of enforcement actions, and has not accumulated reports of recurring service or maintenance issues. For a business owner or individual considering aviation services, an 850 score indicates minimal regulatory risk based on available FAA records. It does not guarantee performance quality or customer satisfaction—no independent customer reviews are currently indexed for this entity—but it does mean the provider has operated within regulatory boundaries and has not triggered FAA intervention or safety-related administrative actions.
Readers should understand that this score is limited to FAA administrative and compliance data. It does not account for factors outside the regulator's purview, such as pricing, responsiveness, or work quality as perceived by customers. The absence of indexed customer reviews means there is no third-party feedback yet available on this page.
How the sub-scores break down
Certificate Standing: 850
This sub-score reflects the status of the provider's FAA airworthiness certificates. A maximum score here means all required certificates are current, valid, and in good standing with no lapses, suspensions, or revocations on record. In aviation, certificates are the baseline requirement—without them, a provider cannot legally operate. A score of 850 in this dimension indicates SPITLER JOHN has maintained all necessary licensing and certification without interruption.
FAA Enforcement: 850
This sub-score measures the absence of enforcement actions taken by the FAA. These actions can include warnings, fines, citations, or certificate actions resulting from regulatory violations. A maximum score means no such actions appear in FAA enforcement records. This is significant because enforcement typically signals a pattern of non-compliance or a material violation serious enough to warrant regulatory intervention. An 850 here indicates the provider has not triggered enforcement mechanisms.
Service Difficulty Reports: 850
This sub-score reflects data from FAA Service Difficulty Reports (SDRs), which are filed when aircraft, components, or services experience recurring or systemic problems. A high score means either no SDRs have been filed against this provider, or any filed reports do not suggest a pattern of defective work or unsafe service delivery. A maximum score indicates a clean record in this category.
What regulators in WY track for aviation providers
The FAA maintains airworthiness certificates for aircraft operators, maintenance providers, and related aviation services. These certificates come with ongoing compliance requirements: operators must meet maintenance schedules, pass inspections, maintain training standards, and adhere to operational limitations. Lapses in any of these areas can result in certificate suspension or revocation.
FAA enforcement records capture formal regulatory actions. Common infractions include operating without proper certification, failing required inspections, maintaining inadequate maintenance logs, or safety violations. The presence or absence of enforcement actions is a direct indicator of regulatory compliance history.
Service Difficulty Reports are a pilot-reported system. When an aircraft experiences a mechanical or service-related failure, the pilot or operator can file an SDR. Patterns of SDRs tied to a single maintenance provider, component supplier, or operator indicate systemic quality issues that draw FAA attention and trigger investigation.
All three data streams—certificates, enforcement, and SDRs—are public and form the foundation of Verdica's aviation provider scores.
Bottom line
SPITLER JOHN holds an excellent compliance record with no apparent FAA enforcement history or airworthiness certificate issues. Before engaging this provider, consider requesting references or performance documentation directly, as the regulatory score does not measure customer experience or work quality. Independent customer feedback, once available, would provide additional perspective.