What Verdica's 850 score means for THOMAS CHARLES L
THOMAS CHARLES L has achieved Verdica's maximum composite score of 850 out of 850, placing the entity in the "excellent" band (800–850). This score reflects a clean record across all three regulatory dimensions that Verdica monitors: Certificate Standing, FAA Enforcement, and Service Difficulty Reports.
A score of 850 means that, based on available FAA records, there are no active enforcement actions, no unresolved airworthiness certificate issues, and no pattern of service difficulty reports on file. This is the highest confidence signal Verdica can generate from public regulatory data. Readers should interpret this as indicating that the entity meets or exceeds baseline compliance expectations as of the data pull date. However, it's important to note that a perfect score reflects the absence of red flags in regulatory records, not a positive endorsement of service quality or business practices beyond regulatory compliance. No independent customer reviews are currently indexed, so potential users should consider supplementing this regulatory assessment with direct reference checks or operational inquiries.
How the sub-scores break down
Certificate Standing (850): This sub-score reflects the status of THOMAS CHARLES L's FAA airworthiness certificates and licensing credentials. A score of 850 indicates no lapsed, suspended, or revoked certificates on record. In aviation, certificate standing is foundational—it confirms that an entity is legally authorized to operate or maintain aircraft or related equipment. A perfect score here means the entity has kept all required certificates current and has not triggered regulatory suspension or termination actions.
FAA Enforcement (850): This sub-score aggregates the entity's history of formal FAA enforcement actions, including citations, warnings, fines, or compliance orders. A score of 850 signals no open or recent enforcement docket entries. In the aviation industry, enforcement records are a primary compliance indicator because they document violations of Federal Aviation Regulations (FARs) or safety directives. The absence of enforcement activity suggests the entity has not been cited for regulatory breaches by FAA inspectors.
Service Difficulty Reports (850): This sub-score reflects trends in Service Difficulty Reports (SDRs)—mandatory filings by operators and maintainers documenting mechanical failures, defects, or unsafe conditions discovered during maintenance or operation. A score of 850 indicates no significant pattern of reported difficulties. While individual SDRs are not inherently violations, they provide a window into operational reliability and maintenance quality. A clean SDR history suggests fewer documented instances of component failures or maintenance surprises.
What regulators in SD track for aviation providers
South Dakota's aviation regulatory landscape is overseen by the FAA at the federal level. The FAA maintains a public repository of airworthiness certificates (issued to aircraft, engines, and certain components), enforcement records (including administrative actions and civil penalties), and Service Difficulty Reports (submitted voluntarily by operators and maintenance providers).
Certificate status is tracked continuously; providers must renew or validate certificates per regulatory schedules. Enforcement records document violations such as failure to follow maintenance procedures, operating aircraft beyond approved limits, record-keeping deficiencies, or safety directive non-compliance. Service Difficulty Reports are tracked to identify systemic issues or recurring defects that might signal quality or design problems.
Scores move downward when entities accumulate enforcement actions, allow certificates to lapse, or generate a high volume of service difficulty reports. The FAA publishes these records to support transparency and enable potential customers or business partners to assess regulatory risk.
Bottom line
THOMAS CHARLES L presents no regulatory red flags based on current FAA records and achieves the highest confidence score Verdica can assign. Anyone considering engagement should view this score as confirmation of clean regulatory standing but should still conduct independent reference checks, verify insurance status, and confirm operational scope directly with the provider.