What Verdica's 850 score means for TROM MICHAEL S
TROM MICHAEL S holds a perfect composite score of 850 out of 850, placing the entity in Verdica's "excellent" band (800–850). This score reflects compliance data pulled from FAA airworthiness certificates and enforcement records—the regulatory foundation for aviation provider oversight in Missouri and beyond.
A score in this range indicates that, based on available regulatory records, the provider has demonstrated sustained adherence to federal aviation standards across all measured dimensions. No independent customer reviews are currently indexed, so the score is built entirely on objective regulator data rather than subjective feedback. For a business owner or consumer evaluating aviation services, this means the regulatory record shows no documented deficiencies, violations, or certificate standing issues that would trigger scoring deductions.
The reader should interpret this as a clean compliance slate: the FAA's records on file do not reflect enforcement actions, service difficulty patterns, or airworthiness certificate lapses that would lower confidence. However, an excellent score is not a guarantee of service quality, pricing, or customer experience—it is a snapshot of regulatory compliance status at the time of data collection.
How the sub-scores break down
Certificate Standing: 850
This sub-score reflects the status of airworthiness certificates and operational authorizations held by TROM MICHAEL S. A perfect score in this dimension means the FAA's certificate records show no suspensions, revocations, or unresolved deficiency notices. In aviation, certificate standing is the baseline: without valid certification, a provider cannot legally operate. A score of 850 here signals that all required certificates are current and in good standing.
FAA Enforcement: 850
This sub-score measures the absence or presence of enforcement actions documented in FAA records—items such as civil penalties, airworthiness directives issued against the entity, or formal compliance orders. A perfect score of 850 means Verdica found no enforcement records in the FAA database associated with TROM MICHAEL S. In the aviation industry, enforcement typically follows documented unsafe conditions, non-compliance with maintenance standards, or operational violations. The lack of enforcement history is a positive indicator for regulatory discipline.
Service Difficulty Reports: 850
Service Difficulty Reports (SDRs) are filed by certificated mechanics and operators to flag recurring or systemic problems with aircraft or components. The FAA tracks these reports to identify safety trends. A score of 850 indicates no pattern of SDRs linked to TROM MICHAEL S—either the provider operates in a way that does not generate these reports, or none have been filed against them. This dimension typically reflects maintenance quality and operational consistency.
What regulators in MO track for aviation providers
The FAA maintains a public registry of airworthiness certificates, which serve as proof that an aircraft, engine, or component meets federal safety standards. Providers in Missouri must hold appropriate certificates to conduct maintenance, operate aircraft, or repair components. The FAA also publishes enforcement records—civil penalties, legal actions, and compliance orders—available to the public through searchable databases.
Service Difficulty Reports constitute a secondary compliance signal. They are filed voluntarily and are used by the FAA to identify systemic safety issues before they result in accidents or formal violations. A provider with frequent SDRs might not be formally sanctioned but could indicate emerging quality concerns.
These three data streams—certificate status, enforcement history, and SDR patterns—form the backbone of Verdica's scoring model. A provider's score moves lower when records show expired certificates, active enforcement cases, or clusters of difficulty reports. Conversely, a clean record across all three dimensions yields a high score.
Bottom line
TROM MICHAEL S presents a strong regulatory profile based on FAA compliance records, with no documented enforcement actions or certificate deficiencies. Before committing to services, requesters should verify current certificate validity directly with the FAA and, if available, seek independent references or service reviews to round out due diligence beyond regulatory data.