What Verdica's 850 score means for WELLS MICHAEL D
WELLS MICHAEL D in Maine has achieved a perfect composite score of 850 out of 850, placing the entity in Verdica's "excellent" band (800–850). This score reflects a clean regulatory record across all three dimensions that Verdica tracks: Certificate Standing, FAA Enforcement, and Service Difficulty Reports.
An 850 score indicates that the FAA's public records show no active enforcement actions, no airworthiness certificate suspensions or revocations, and no pattern of service difficulty reports filed against this provider. For someone evaluating whether to engage with an aviation provider, this is the highest confidence signal the available federal data can provide. It does not guarantee service quality or customer satisfaction—no independent customer reviews are currently indexed for this entity—but it does mean there are no documented compliance gaps or regulatory red flags in the FAA's records.
Readers should understand that this score reflects only what is publicly available through FAA airworthiness certificates and enforcement databases. It is a necessary but not sufficient basis for decision-making. A perfect regulatory score means the provider has cleared a baseline compliance threshold; it does not speak to responsiveness, pricing, or other business considerations.
How the sub-scores break down
Certificate Standing: 850
This sub-score measures the status of the entity's FAA-issued airworthiness certificates. A perfect 850 indicates that all relevant certificates are active, current, and free of restrictions, suspensions, or revocations. In the aviation industry, certificate standing is foundational: without valid certification, a provider cannot legally operate. A score of 850 means Verdica's underlying FAA records show no lapsed or compromised licensing status.
FAA Enforcement: 850
This dimension tracks formal regulatory actions—violations, cease-and-desist orders, fines, or other enforcement orders issued by the FAA. A perfect 850 means there are no active or historical enforcement records associated with this entity in the FAA database. Enforcement actions typically arise from incidents such as unsafe practices, maintenance lapses, or failure to comply with operating regulations. The absence of such records suggests a consistent track record of rule compliance.
Service Difficulty Reports: 850
Service Difficulty Reports (SDRs) are confidential filings submitted to the FAA by maintenance personnel, pilots, and other aviation professionals documenting equipment failures, maintenance issues, or systemic problems. A perfect 850 indicates no elevated frequency of SDRs for this provider. While a single SDR does not necessarily indicate poor performance—reports are routine in aviation—a pattern of reports can signal recurring problems. The top score here reflects no such pattern in the FAA's indexed records.
What regulators in ME track for aviation providers
The FAA maintains detailed public records of airworthiness certificates, which authorize individuals and organizations to operate, maintain, or service aircraft. Certificate types vary by role—pilot certificates, mechanic licenses, repair station certifications, and manufacturer authorizations are common examples.
Enforcement records document violations of Federal Aviation Regulations (FARs), which cover everything from maintenance procedures and inspection intervals to pilot duty time and aircraft operation standards. Violations can result in warnings, civil penalties, or certificate revocation, depending on severity and history.
Service Difficulty Reports, collected through the FAA's Accident and Incident Data System (AIDS) and related databases, allow frontline aviation workers to flag technical and procedural issues anonymously. These reports feed systemic safety monitoring and can trigger fleet-wide directives or airworthiness directives (ADs) if patterns emerge.
These three data streams—certificate status, enforcement history, and service reports—form the foundation of FAA oversight and the basis for Verdica's scoring model.
Bottom line
WELLS MICHAEL D presents an excellent regulatory profile with no documented FAA compliance issues. Anyone considering engaging this provider should still verify that the specific certificates held match the work needed, and should seek independent references or service history to evaluate factors the regulatory database does not capture.