What Verdica's 850 score means for ZANUZOSKI ALAN K
ZANUZOSKI ALAN K has achieved a composite score of 850 out of 850, placing this aviation provider in Verdica's highest performance band (800–850). This score reflects a record free of documented enforcement actions, active airworthiness certificate standing, and no indexed service difficulty reports.
Readers should understand that a perfect score does not mean the provider has never faced operational challenges—it means that as of the data refresh, no FAA enforcement records, certificate suspensions, or pattern-level maintenance or safety reports are on file. This is the strongest possible indicator available from public regulator data. For business owners and consumers evaluating aviation providers, an 850 score suggests minimal compliance risk based on available federal records, though it should be cross-referenced with other due diligence steps, such as direct references and insurance status.
How the sub-scores break down
Certificate Standing (850/850)
This sub-score reflects airworthiness certificate status—whether the provider holds valid, active certification required to operate legally in their domain. A perfect 850 indicates no lapses, revocations, or suspensions on record. In aviation, certificate standing is a gating requirement; a score below perfect would signal an immediate licensing problem.
FAA Enforcement (850/850)
This dimension captures formal enforcement actions from the Federal Aviation Administration, including violations, warnings, fines, or certificate actions. The FAA enforces airworthiness standards, maintenance protocols, pilot qualifications, and operational safety rules. A score of 850 means no enforcement history is indexed in the underlying FAA records used by Verdica. Enforcement records are public and persistent, so their absence is a strong data point.
Service Difficulty Reports (850/850)
Service Difficulty Reports (SDRs) are voluntary or mandatory reports filed by operators, maintenance providers, and manufacturers when they identify mechanical, design, or maintenance issues. The FAA aggregates these to identify systemic problems. A perfect score here means no patterns of reported difficulties are associated with this provider in the indexed data. A high SDR count typically correlates with operational or quality issues; the absence of indexed reports supports a lower-risk profile.
What regulators in OR track for aviation providers
The FAA maintains multiple public databases that feed compliance scoring for Oregon aviation providers:
Airworthiness Certificates document whether an aircraft or component meets safety standards for flight. Providers must maintain valid certificates appropriate to their scope of work. Certificate revocation or suspension is rare but immediately visible.
Enforcement Records include violation notices (Notice of Proposed Assessment), cease-and-desist orders, fines, and certificate actions. These are outcomes of FAA investigations into alleged breaches of Federal Aviation Regulations (FARs). Common violation categories include improper maintenance record-keeping, unqualified personnel, use of unapproved parts, and non-compliance with airworthiness directives.
Service Difficulty Reports flag recurring mechanical failures, maintenance defects, or design flaws. Patterns in SDRs can trigger FAA inspection campaigns or airworthiness directives. A provider with many SDRs may indicate recurring quality or documentation issues, though individual reports alone are not proof of fault.
Oregon aviation providers are also subject to state regulations through the Oregon Department of Aviation, though Verdica's scoring relies primarily on FAA federal data. Business operators should verify that a provider holds appropriate ratings (e.g., Inspection Authorization, Repairman certificate, or type rating) for their specific aircraft or work scope.
Bottom line
ZANUZOSKI ALAN K presents the lowest compliance risk available in Verdica's scoring framework, with no FAA enforcement history, active certificate standing, and no indexed service difficulty patterns. Anyone considering this provider should still verify insurance coverage, ask for verifiable references, and confirm specific qualifications match their aircraft or maintenance needs—a clean regulatory record is a necessary but not sufficient foundation for vendor selection.