What Verdica's 850 score means for ZIMMERMAN PAUL
ZIMMERMAN PAUL has achieved a composite score of 850 out of 850, placing the entity in Verdica's highest performance band (800–850, graded A). This score reflects alignment across all three regulatory dimensions tracked: Certificate Standing, FAA Enforcement history, and Service Difficulty Reports.
A score in this range indicates that the FAA airworthiness certificates and enforcement records on file show no documented compliance gaps, violations, or service-related red flags in the indexed data. For a business owner or consumer evaluating aviation service providers, this means the entity has maintained clean regulatory standing as recorded by the FAA.
It's important to note that Verdica's score is built on public FAA records and does not yet include independent customer reviews for this entity. The 850 reflects regulator-facing compliance, not customer experience. A reader should understand this score as one data point in a broader vendor evaluation—strong on the regulatory side, but supplemented by direct references, site visits, or conversations with current clients for a fuller picture.
How the sub-scores break down
Certificate Standing: 850 This sub-score evaluates the status and validity of FAA-issued airworthiness certificates and related licensing credentials. A perfect score in this dimension means the entity holds current, unencumbered certificates with no suspension, revocation, or compliance deficiency notices recorded in the FAA's certificate database. In the aviation industry, certificate standing is foundational; any lapse, restriction, or corrective action would lower this score. An 850 here signals that Verdica's data pull found no such issues.
FAA Enforcement: 850 This sub-score tracks the entity's enforcement history—civil penalties, notices of noncompliance, or corrective action orders issued by the FAA. A perfect enforcement score means no enforcement actions are indexed in Verdica's FAA dataset for this entity. In aviation, enforcement actions can range from minor warnings to significant fines or operational restrictions. A zero-enforcement record (reflected in the 850) is rare and typically indicates sustained adherence to FAA rules across multiple inspection cycles.
Service Difficulty Reports: 850 Service Difficulty Reports (SDRs) are mandatory FAA filings that document mechanical issues, safety anomalies, or defects discovered during aircraft maintenance or operation. A high score in this dimension reflects a low frequency of reported difficulties or none at all. An 850 indicates that Verdica's indexed SDR data shows no problematic patterns—either very few reports filed by or attributed to this entity, or reports that, if filed, were resolved without regulatory escalation. This sub-score is particularly relevant for maintenance providers, repair stations, or operators.
What regulators in CA track for aviation providers
The FAA maintains several public databases that feed compliance scoring for aviation entities:
Airworthiness Certificates and Licensing: The FAA issues and renews certificates for mechanics, inspectors, pilot-in-command ratings, and repair stations. Certificates can be suspended or revoked for violation of operating rules, maintenance failures, or safety incidents. Verdica monitors the current status and any corrective actions tied to these credentials.
Enforcement Records: The FAA's Legal Enforcement Database records civil penalties (14 CFR violations), Notices of Noncompliance, and Corrective Action Notices. These range from paperwork or procedural lapses to serious airworthiness defects. A provider with a clean enforcement record has passed multiple inspection touchpoints without triggering regulatory action.
Service Difficulty Reports: Mandated under 14 CFR Part 21, SDRs are filed by manufacturers, operators, and repair facilities when they discover defects or malfunctions that could affect safety. The FAA aggregates these to identify systemic issues and track provider patterns. Frequent or unresolved SDRs can lead to enforcement action.
All three dimensions are public-facing compliance measures. A provider's score reflects only what the FAA's official records show, not internal quality metrics or operational practices.
Bottom line
ZIMMERMAN PAUL's 850 score indicates excellent standing across all FAA regulatory dimensions—no enforcement actions, certificate deficiencies, or service difficulty concerns in the indexed data. For a prospective client, this is a positive signal on regulatory compliance. However, verify current operational scope, request customer references, and confirm insurance and liability coverage independently; a regulatory score does not replace due diligence.