What Verdica's 850 score means for ZYSKO JAN A
An 850 composite score places ZYSKO JAN A in Verdica's excellent band (800–850). This score reflects compliance data across three regulatory dimensions: Certificate Standing, FAA Enforcement, and Service Difficulty Reports. All three sub-scores are at maximum (850), indicating no flagged issues in the indexed FAA airworthiness certificates or enforcement records that Verdica monitors.
For a business owner or consumer evaluating this provider, an 850 score signals that available regulatory data shows no active enforcement actions, lapses in certification, or recurring maintenance or technical difficulty patterns. This does not mean the provider has never had a minor issue; rather, it means nothing in the FAA's public records shows a pattern or current problem that would lower the score. The lack of independent customer reviews indexed on this page means Verdica cannot yet cross-check regulatory compliance against real-world user experience, so readers should treat the 850 as a strong baseline—not a complete picture.
How the sub-scores break down
Certificate Standing (850). This reflects the validity and status of the provider's FAA airworthiness certificates. A perfect sub-score indicates the certificates are current, unrestricted, and properly maintained in FAA records. In aviation, certificate standing is the foundation; any lapse, revocation, or modification would lower this score significantly. A score of 850 here means no gaps in licensing that FAA records show.
FAA Enforcement (850). This dimension tracks enforcement actions—citations, warnings, or consent orders—issued by the FAA. A perfect score means no active or recent enforcement records are indexed. In the aviation industry, enforcement can range from minor paperwork violations to serious airworthiness defects or repeated non-compliance. A provider with frequent small infractions or even one major violation would see this sub-score drop. The 850 indicates a clean enforcement record in available FAA data.
Service Difficulty Reports (850). This captures recurring technical or maintenance issues reported through FAA systems (such as mandatory incident or malfunction reports). A high score here suggests no pattern of repeated failures, design defects, or maintenance problems flagged by users or technicians. Lower scores in this dimension often signal equipment reliability concerns or a pattern of similar problems. The 850 indicates no such pattern in indexed reports.
What regulators in FL track for aviation providers
The FAA maintains airworthiness certificates for aircraft and operators, requiring renewals and compliance with specific technical and operational standards. Certificate holders must report accidents, incidents, and maintenance anomalies through formal Service Difficulty Report systems. The FAA also enforces compliance through inspections and can issue enforcement actions for violations of Federal Aviation Regulations (FARs)—ranging from procedural errors to serious safety violations.
In Florida specifically, FAA Regional Flight Surgeons, Airmen Certification offices, and Flight Standards District Offices oversee local compliance. These regulators track certificate validity, timely reporting of defects, and adherence to maintenance schedules. An enforcement action might arise from unreported maintenance issues, failure to complete required training, operating an aircraft without current certification, or safety violations.
Verdica's score reflects only what appears in public FAA records. A provider could still have internal quality issues, customer complaints, or operational challenges not yet reflected in FAA enforcement or Service Difficulty Reports—especially if the provider is relatively new or low-volume.
Bottom line
ZYSKO JAN A shows excellent regulatory standing based on available FAA data, with no flags in certificate status, enforcement, or reported technical patterns. Before committing to service, verify current certifications directly with the FAA, request references, and—as customer reviews become available—cross-check this regulatory baseline against real-world feedback.