What Verdica's 839 score means for WASHINGTON WINE CELLARS LLC
WASHINGTON WINE CELLARS LLC scores 839 out of 850 on Verdica's composite scale, placing it in the "excellent" band (800–850). This score reflects a track record with minimal regulatory friction across the two primary dimensions Verdica monitors: occupational safety enforcement and contractor licensing compliance in Washington State.
A score at this level indicates that the entity has maintained good standing with state licensing authorities and has not accumulated significant OSHA violations or enforcement actions. For a business owner or consumer evaluating construction providers, an 839 score suggests lower regulatory risk compared to the broader market. However, the score is composite—built from three separate sub-scores—and it's worth understanding where the strongest and most recent compliance performance sits. No independent customer reviews are currently indexed for this entity, so the score reflects regulatory data only.
How the sub-scores break down
License Standing (850). This perfect sub-score means WASHINGTON WINE CELLARS LLC holds a current, active license in Washington State with no recorded suspensions, revocations, or disciplinary actions in the licensing database. In construction, a license standing score at the maximum reflects that regulators have found no cause to sanction the entity's right to operate. This is the most binary of the three measures: you either hold valid credentials or you don't.
OSHA Enforcement (850). This sub-score also maxes out, indicating no significant occupational safety violations or enforcement actions recorded in the OSHA inspection history tied to this entity. OSHA tracks workplace injuries, safety violations, and corrective action compliance across construction sites. A perfect score in this dimension means the entity has either avoided OSHA inspection, passed inspections without material findings, or resolved any citations without escalation to willful or repeat violation status.
License Recency (775). This sub-score is the lowest of the three, at 775—still in the strong range, but notably lower than the other two. License recency reflects how recently the entity renewed or updated its contractor license in Washington. A score of 775 suggests the license is current but may not have been renewed in the most recent filing window, or the underlying credential may be older relative to other active contractors. In most states, contractor licenses require periodic renewal (typically every 1–3 years). This sub-score moving down slightly is common as time passes between renewal cycles and is not itself a red flag; it simply indicates the regulatory credential is not brand-new.
What regulators in WA track for construction providers
Washington's contractor licensing system requires providers to meet education, bonding, and experience standards before issuance. Regulators monitor compliance through license renewals, complaint investigations, and disciplinary action. Scores move down if a provider fails to renew on time, faces complaints that trigger investigation, or accumulates violations serious enough to warrant probation or sanction.
OSHA inspections in construction focus on jobsite safety: fall protection, electrical hazards, equipment operation, hazard communication, and injury reporting. When inspectors issue citations, they assign severity levels (other, serious, willful, repeat). A perfect OSHA enforcement score means either no inspections occurred or all inspections resulted in no violations. The score can degrade if an entity accumulates serious or willful citations, fails to abate violations, or shows a pattern of repeat violations across multiple sites.
Both measures are backward-looking and rule-based: they reflect regulatory records, not forward-looking capability assessments.
Bottom line
WASHINGTON WINE CELLARS LLC presents a low-risk profile based on regulatory data, with strong license standing and OSHA compliance. Before engaging, verify that the entity's current license scope matches your specific project type, and consider requesting references or insurance verification to fill the gap where customer reviews are not yet available.