What Verdica's 771 score means for Arkansas State University-Beebe
Arkansas State University-Beebe scores 771 out of 850 on Verdica's composite assessment, placing it in the "strong" band (740–799). This indicates a provider with solid regulatory standing and measurable outcomes, though not in the highest tier of performance.
A score of 771 reflects an institution that has demonstrated compliance across accreditation, federal aid, and data reporting obligations, and has produced student outcome metrics that meet or exceed baseline expectations. For a reader evaluating this provider—whether as a prospective student, employer partner, or stakeholder—this score suggests lower regulatory risk than a provider scoring below 670, but also signals room for improvement in one or more performance dimensions.
The gap between 771 and the "excellent" threshold of 800+ is meaningful. It means the institution is not flagged for systemic problems, but has at least one measurable area where performance lags behind top performers in its cohort. As outlined below, that gap stems primarily from Student Outcomes metrics, where ASU-Beebe's sub-score of 640 notably underperforms its Accreditation and Compliance pillars.
How the sub-scores break down
Accreditation: 845 (excellent range) This reflects the institution's standing with its regional or specialized accreditors. A score of 845 indicates no active sanctions, warning statuses, or denial of accreditation. The institution has met the standards required by its accrediting body and maintains good standing for the programs it operates. In practice, this means the institution's academic and operational credentials are recognized by federal and state bodies.
Student Outcomes: 640 (elevated range) This sub-score measures graduation rates, retention, employment outcomes, and other IPEDS-derived indicators that reflect what happens to students after enrollment. A score of 640 sits at the lower end of acceptable-to-elevated performance. It suggests that while the institution is not an outlier in negative terms, its student completion and success metrics are not among the strongest in its comparison group. This could reflect lower graduation rates, delayed time-to-degree, or employment outcomes that fall short of state or national averages for similar institution types.
Compliance: 835 (excellent range) This reflects adherence to Title IV federal aid program rules, data accuracy and timeliness in IPEDS reporting, and absence of financial or program violations. A score of 835 indicates the institution files required reports on time, maintains proper financial controls, and has not incurred the kind of sanctions (teach-out requirements, aid suspensions, fines) that would lower this metric. Federal and state auditors have not identified material problems in how the institution handles student aid funds or data.
What regulators in AR track for education providers
Accreditation bodies (such as SACSCOC for community colleges and regional institutions) conduct peer-review and site-visit assessments of institutional quality, mission fulfillment, and governance. Loss or restriction of accreditation can result in loss of federal aid eligibility and transfer credit recognition.
Title IV compliance monitoring by the U.S. Department of Education and state authorizers focuses on federal student aid administration, financial management, and program integrity. Violations can trigger audits, repayment demands, or temporary suspension of aid eligibility.
IPEDS data—enrollment, degrees awarded, retention, completion, and employment outcomes—is published annually and forms the basis for institutional accountability reporting. Anomalies or systematic underperformance can prompt deeper scrutiny by accreditors and regulators.
Arkansas-specific oversight comes through the Arkansas Higher Education Coordinating Board and state licensing bodies that monitor program approval and compliance with state regulations.
Bottom line
Arkansas State University-Beebe is a low-risk provider with solid regulatory compliance and accreditation standing, but with notably weaker student outcome performance that warrants attention. Anyone considering enrollment or partnership should review specific graduation rates, time-to-degree, and employment outcomes for their program of interest, and cross-check those against comparable institutions in the state.