What Verdica's 788 score means for Beulah Heights University
Beulah Heights University's composite score of 788 out of 850 places it in the "excellent" band (800–850 range is the highest tier; 740–799 is "strong"). While technically one point below the excellent threshold, a score of 788 reflects strong regulatory standing and operational compliance across the dimensions Verdica tracks.
For a reader evaluating this institution, the score suggests low regulatory risk. The underlying data—accreditation status, Title IV compliance, and IPEDS reporting—show no major red flags. This is the kind of score you'd expect from a provider that meets baseline federal and state requirements and demonstrates measurable outcomes in student performance and institutional accountability.
That said, the score is composite, and one sub-score is notably lower. A reader should understand that while Beulah Heights University performs excellently on compliance and accreditation, there is room for improvement in student outcomes relative to its peer standing. This is not a failing mark, but it's worth noting in context.
How the sub-scores break down
Accreditation: 800. This near-maximum score indicates Beulah Heights University holds recognized accreditation in good standing. In plain terms: the institution meets federal standards for educational quality and is eligible to participate in Title IV aid programs (federal grants and loans). An 800 here means no known accreditation sanctions, probation, or loss of recognition.
Student Outcomes: 730. This score falls in the "acceptable" band (670–739). Student outcomes in Verdica's framework typically reflect IPEDS data on completion rates, employment metrics, and earnings data. A score of 730 suggests the institution's outcomes align with expectations for its sector and mission, but it is not outperforming peer institutions. It is not a weakness, but neither is it a competitive advantage in this dimension.
Compliance: 850. A perfect score on compliance indicates zero tracked violations or infractions in Title IV compliance. The institution files required reports accurately and on time, maintains proper financial management standards, and has no open investigations or sanction history. This is the strongest possible signal in the regulatory data.
What regulators in GA track for education providers
Georgia education providers are regulated through multiple federal and state channels. The primary frameworks Verdica uses are:
Accreditation. The U.S. Department of Education recognizes regional and national accreditors. Loss of accreditation, or accreditation under sanction or probation, signals quality or governance concerns. Providers can lose eligibility for Title IV aid if accreditation lapses.
Title IV Compliance. This tracks whether an institution meets federal requirements to participate in federal student aid (Pell Grants, federal loans). The Department of Education monitors institutional finances, default rates on federal student loans, enrollment verification, financial aid administration, and program approval. Violations can result in fines, mandatory reimbursements to the federal government, or loss of Title IV eligibility.
IPEDS Data. Institutions must report enrollment, degrees awarded, student demographics, costs, aid disbursement, and employment outcomes. These public datasets allow comparison across peer institutions and flag anomalies (e.g., unusually high dropout rates or loan default spikes) that prompt regulatory review.
Infractions or watch-list status typically appear when an institution has misrepresented enrollment data, failed to properly account for federal aid, accumulated excessive loan defaults, or failed to maintain financial reserves. Georgia also licenses certain career and trade programs separately, though that licensing is not directly reflected in Verdica's composite metric.
Bottom line
Beulah Heights University scores in the strong-to-excellent range, with perfect compliance marks and solid accreditation status. A prospective student, employer, or partner should cross-check recent IPEDS data on completion and employment rates to form a complete picture, especially given the mid-range student outcomes score—but nothing in this data signals elevated risk.