What Verdica's 767 score means for City Colleges of Chicago-Richard J Daley College
City Colleges of Chicago-Richard J Daley College scores 767 out of 850 on Verdica's composite assessment, placing it in the "strong" band (740–799). This indicates a provider that demonstrates solid regulatory standing and operational compliance across the measured dimensions.
A score in this range suggests the institution is meeting baseline federal and state requirements and maintaining accreditation status. However, it is not in the highest tier (800–850, "excellent"), which means there are areas where performance either lags peer institutions or shows measurable room for improvement. For a business partner, employer, or prospective student evaluating this institution, the 767 score conveys a generally dependable provider with some notable constraints worth understanding before committing significant resources or enrollment.
The composite reflects three regulatory and outcome dimensions tracked by Verdica. No independent customer reviews have been indexed for this entity yet, so the score is based entirely on regulatory data sources: accreditation status, Title IV federal compliance, and institutional performance data from IPEDS (the Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System).
How the sub-scores break down
Accreditation: 845
This sub-score is in the "excellent" range. Accreditation status is a foundational measure of institutional legitimacy and quality assurance. A score of 845 indicates that Richard J Daley College holds recognized accreditation and meets the standards set by its accrediting body. In practice, accreditation is required for institutions to participate in federal student aid programs and is renewed periodically through peer review. A high accreditation score signals that the institution has passed rigorous external review.
Compliance: 835
Also in the "excellent" range, this sub-score reflects the institution's adherence to federal Title IV requirements and related regulatory obligations. Title IV compliance covers how an institution manages federal student aid funds, maintains accurate record-keeping, and follows Department of Education rules. A score of 835 suggests the college is meeting these obligations without major violations or audit findings that would trigger enforcement action.
Student Outcomes: 630
This sub-score falls into the "elevated" band (580–669), representing the weakest dimension of the three. Student outcomes metrics typically include graduation rates, student loan repayment rates, and other measures of whether students complete their programs and successfully transition to employment or further education. A score of 630 indicates measurable performance in these areas, but below the level achieved in accreditation and compliance. This gap is the primary reason the composite score sits at 767 rather than higher.
What regulators in IL track for education providers
Illinois education providers are subject to accreditation oversight by regional or national accrediting bodies recognized by the U.S. Department of Education. These bodies conduct comprehensive reviews of institutional mission, curriculum, faculty, and student support on a multi-year cycle.
Title IV compliance tracking monitors federal student aid administration. The Department of Education audits institutions for violations such as improper disbursement of aid, failure to verify student eligibility, inadequate loan servicing practices, or misrepresentation to students. Serious violations can result in reduced aid eligibility, fines, or loss of Title IV participation.
IPEDS data collection requires all Title IV-participating institutions to report standardized metrics including enrollment counts, graduation rates, student loan default rates, and completion timelines. These metrics allow regulators and the public to compare institutional performance and identify outliers. Institutions with persistently low completion or high loan default rates may face additional scrutiny or sanctions.
Scores move based on accreditation actions (warnings, probation, or full accreditation status), Title IV audit outcomes, and IPEDS-reported performance trends.
Bottom line
Richard J Daley College presents as a compliant, accredited institution with solid regulatory footing but notably weaker student outcome performance relative to its accreditation and compliance strength. A prospective employer, partner, or student should verify current graduation and completion rates independently and understand whether those outcomes align with their expectations before proceeding.