What Verdica's 767 score means for College of Southern Idaho
College of Southern Idaho scores 767 out of 850 on Verdica's composite measure, placing it in the "strong" band (740–799). This score reflects overall institutional health across three regulatory and outcome dimensions tracked by the U.S. Department of Education and accrediting bodies.
A strong score indicates the institution is meeting baseline compliance requirements and maintaining reasonable operational standards. It is not the highest tier—institutions in the "excellent" band (800–850) demonstrate even fewer regulatory flags—but it signals that College of Southern Idaho is generally managing its Title IV obligations, maintaining recognized accreditation, and producing measurable student outcomes within acceptable ranges.
For someone considering enrollment, employment, or partnership, a 767 suggests the institution is operationally sound and not under imminent regulatory sanctions. However, the score also points to specific areas where performance lags. The sub-score breakdown reveals where relative strengths and weaknesses lie.
How the sub-scores break down
Accreditation: 845. This near-excellent score means College of Southern Idaho holds current institutional or programmatic accreditation from a recognized body and has not triggered warning flags with its accreditor. Accreditation is the primary seal of legitimacy in higher education; without it, credits typically do not transfer and federal student aid is not available. A score of 845 reflects clean accreditation status with no known pending actions or loss of standing.
Compliance: 835. This score reflects adherence to Title IV regulations—the federal framework governing student aid disbursement, loan servicing, and institutional accountability. A compliance score in this range indicates the institution has filed required reports (the Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System, or IPEDS), maintained acceptable loan default rates, and not incurred audit findings or sanctions. Compliance violations include misreporting enrollment data, improper aid disbursement, or systematic defaults that exceed federal thresholds.
Student Outcomes: 630. This is the weakest of the three sub-scores and falls into the "elevated" band (580–669), suggesting measurable performance gaps. Student outcomes typically track graduation rates, employment rates within six months of completion, earnings relative to peer institutions, and loan repayment behavior. A score of 630 does not indicate failure—it means outcomes are below institutional peer averages or trending downward. This warrants scrutiny for prospective students, particularly those taking on debt or pursuing programs with historically lower employment rates.
What regulators in ID track for education providers
Idaho's education oversight is split between the Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities (NWCCU), which accredits most regional public and private institutions, and the U.S. Department of Education's Office of Federal Student Aid.
Accreditation bodies audit institutions on a regular cycle, reviewing financial stability, governance, educational quality, and mission alignment. Loss or suspension of accreditation is rare but signals severe operational problems.
Title IV compliance monitoring focuses on student aid administration. Regulators flag institutions if federal student loan cohort default rates exceed 30 percent for three consecutive years, if IPEDS submissions are incomplete or fraudulent, or if audits reveal systematic misuse of aid funds. Idaho providers must also comply with state-level consumer protection laws around admissions disclosures and program outcome claims.
IPEDS data—enrollment, completion, employment, and earnings—is public and forms the backbone of outcome scoring. Institutions with declining enrollments, low completion rates, or below-median earnings for graduates will see downward pressure on outcome scores.
Bottom line
College of Southern Idaho is a compliance-solid institution with one notable area of concern: student outcomes lag behind benchmarks. Before enrolling or referring students, confirm that your program of interest has strong placement and earnings data, and request outcome statistics directly from the college. The accreditation and compliance scores provide confidence in institutional stability, but the outcome score suggests careful program selection is warranted.