What Verdica's 787 score means for George Washington University
George Washington University's composite score of 787 out of 850 places it in the "strong" band (740–799), indicating reliable institutional performance across accreditation, student outcomes, and compliance dimensions. This score suggests the institution meets regulatory expectations and maintains acceptable operational standards, though it is not at the highest tier.
For a prospective student, employee, or partner evaluating the university, a score in this range signals institutional stability and regulatory standing. The score reflects Verdica's indexed data on accreditation status, Title IV federal financial aid compliance, and IPEDS reporting accuracy. No independent customer reviews have been indexed for this entity yet, so the score is based entirely on regulatory and administrative records rather than user experience feedback.
The interpretation is straightforward: GWU demonstrates solid compliance infrastructure and maintains accreditation, but has room for improvement in student outcomes metrics. Readers should view this as a passing grade with noted performance variability across institutional functions.
How the sub-scores break down
Accreditation: 845/850 — This near-excellent score reflects GWU's standing with its accrediting body. In the education sector, accreditation is the baseline regulatory requirement; institutions must maintain recognized accreditation to operate legally and to offer federal financial aid. A score this high indicates the university holds current accreditation with minimal cited deficiencies or compliance warnings from its accrediting commission.
Student Outcomes: 690/850 — This score falls in the "acceptable" band (670–739) and is the lowest of the three sub-scores. Student outcomes metrics typically include graduation rates, retention rates, employment outcomes, and loan default rates—all drawn from IPEDS (Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System) reporting. A score at this level suggests GWU's performance on these measures meets minimum standards but lags peer benchmarks or national averages in one or more category. This is a common pressure point for large research universities, where graduation rates and time-to-degree can be affected by academic selectivity, transfer patterns, and program structure.
Compliance: 830/850 — This strong score indicates GWU maintains solid Title IV compliance and administrative reporting standards. Title IV refers to the federal student aid program; institutions must demonstrate accurate financial aid disbursement, timely reporting to the Department of Education, and adherence to student eligibility rules. A compliance score this high suggests no major Title IV violations, accurate IPEDS data submission, and clean audit trails on federal fund management.
What regulators in DC track for education providers
The District of Columbia and federal regulators oversee education providers through three primary mechanisms reflected in Verdica's scoring:
Accreditation is managed by regional and specialized accrediting commissions recognized by the U.S. Department of Education. These bodies audit institutional quality, faculty credentials, curriculum rigor, and financial stability on multi-year cycles. Deficiencies trigger warnings or probation; repeated non-compliance can result in accreditation loss.
Title IV Compliance is monitored by the Department of Education's Office of Federal Student Aid. Regulators track loan disbursement accuracy, student eligibility verification, default rates, and fraud controls. Violations can result in fines, loss of aid eligibility, or mandatory debt collection.
IPEDS Reporting requires institutions to submit standardized data on enrollment, graduation, retention, and employment outcomes. These datasets inform rankings, federal accountability metrics, and consumer decision-making. Inaccurate reporting can trigger investigations and reputational damage.
In DC specifically, the Higher Education Licensure Commission may also oversee institutional operations, though degree-granting universities with regional accreditation typically operate under federal oversight.
Bottom line
George Washington University scores in the strong range, indicating solid regulatory standing and accreditation status, offset by acceptable but not exceptional student outcome metrics. Anyone considering enrollment, employment, or partnership should verify current graduation and employment data directly from IPEDS and cross-check GWU's accreditation status with its regional accreditor.