What Verdica's 760 score means for Hebrew Theological College
Hebrew Theological College's composite score of 760 places it in the "strong" band (740–799), indicating that the institution meets or exceeds baseline regulatory expectations across most dimensions tracked by Verdica. A score in this range reflects an education provider with solid compliance posture and measurable outcomes, though not in the top tier.
Readers should understand that a 760 composite score means the college is unlikely to be a regulatory concern in the immediate term. However, the score also signals room for improvement, particularly in student outcomes. For prospective students, employers, or business partners evaluating risk or quality, this score suggests the institution is operationally sound but warrants attention to specific outcome metrics before making high-stakes decisions.
How the sub-scores break down
Accreditation (820): This excellent sub-score indicates Hebrew Theological College holds current, recognized accreditation status from a U.S. Department of Education–approved accreditor. In the education industry, active accreditation is a threshold requirement—without it, institutions cannot participate in federal student aid programs and lose market credibility. A score of 820 suggests no known sanctions, loss of status, or conditions placed on accreditation during the scoring period.
Student Outcomes (640): This is the weakest sub-score and falls into the elevated-risk band. Student outcomes typically measure degree completion rates, employment placement rates post-graduation, earnings trajectories, and loan repayment performance. A score of 640 indicates measurable concerns in one or more of these areas. This does not necessarily mean outcomes are poor in absolute terms, but rather that they lag peers or fall below regulatory thresholds that trigger scrutiny from federal agencies and accreditors.
Compliance (830): This strong sub-score reflects Hebrew Theological College's solid standing on Title IV federal aid program requirements and IPEDS data submissions. Compliance infractions—such as misreporting enrollment figures, failing audit standards, or violating student aid rules—would depress this score. The 830 indicates no major red flags in federal record-keeping or administrative operations.
What regulators in IL track for education providers
Verdica's scoring relies on three primary regulatory data streams:
Accreditation Status: The U.S. Department of Education publishes accreditation records and enforcement actions. Agencies can place institutions on probation, deny renewal, or revoke status if they fail to meet standards in areas such as financial stability, curriculum quality, or institutional governance. Illinois also maintains state approval for certain programs through the Illinois Board of Higher Education, though accreditation is the dominant federal lever.
Title IV Compliance: Institutions participating in federal student aid (loans, Pell grants, work-study) must comply with regulations administered by the Department of Education's Office of Federal Student Aid. Violations include improper enrollment reporting, failure to verify student eligibility, insufficient refund policies, or misuse of aid funds. Repeated violations can result in fines, loss of aid eligibility, or mandatory financial agreements requiring escrow accounts or additional audits.
IPEDS Data: The Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System collects standardized institutional data on enrollment, graduation rates, program offerings, and financial metrics. Institutions must file annual IPEDS surveys; incomplete or inaccurate submissions can trigger warnings and affect federal aid eligibility. IPEDS data underpins federal accountability frameworks, particularly around graduation rates and loan default rates.
Bottom line
Hebrew Theological College earns a "strong" overall rating, supported by solid accreditation and compliance standing. However, the notably lower student outcomes score suggests prospective students and employers should independently verify graduation rates, employment data, and student loan repayment statistics before committing significant resources. Regulators are not flagging immediate risk, but outcome metrics merit closer scrutiny.