What Verdica's 833 score means for ANDERMATT USA
ANDERMATT USA's composite score of 833 out of 850 places the entity squarely in the "excellent" band (800–850). This score reflects strong regulatory standing across the dimensions Verdica tracks: facility operations, compliance signals, and enforcement history. For a business owner or procurement manager evaluating environmental service providers, a score in this range indicates that the entity has demonstrated consistent adherence to federal environmental regulations under the Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, and Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA).
A score of 833 does not mean the entity is perfect—no provider scores 850—but it does signal low regulatory risk. The entity has not accumulated significant violations or enforcement actions that would trigger red flags in EPA databases. This is meaningful data for due diligence: it tells you the provider is operating within legal guardrails as monitored by federal agencies, not that you should skip independent verification of service quality or contract terms.
How the sub-scores break down
Facility Profile (800/850): This sub-score reflects Verdica's assessment of the entity's operational setup, licensing status, and structural compliance with EPA registration and permitting requirements. A score of 800 indicates the facility meets baseline regulatory expectations but may have minor gaps—for instance, a pending permit renewal, a routine inspection finding, or a non-critical compliance note. Facility Profile scores are most sensitive to whether a provider holds current licenses and maintains compliant operational infrastructure.
Compliance Signals (850/850): This is the highest-scoring sub-dimension, meaning ANDERMATT USA shows no active red flags in EPA monitoring systems. Compliance Signals capture ongoing regulatory oversight: timely filing of required reports, no overdue corrective action notices, and no recent citations for violations. A perfect or near-perfect score here suggests the entity has strong internal compliance management—they file on time, respond to regulators promptly, and have not triggered additional scrutiny.
Enforcement Actions (850/850): This sub-score is also perfect, indicating no meaningful history of fines, penalties, or formal enforcement proceedings in the EPA databases that Verdica indexes. Enforcement Actions are typically the most severe indicator: a low score here would flag entities with documented violations, consent orders, or penalty assessments. A score of 850 means the entity is not known to EPA as a repeat violator or problem operator.
What regulators in NJ track for environmental providers
The EPA maintains three primary compliance frameworks Verdica uses to score entities like ANDERMATT USA:
Clean Air Act (CAA): Regulates emissions from stationary sources. Violations include unpermitted operations, exceeding emission limits, failure to maintain monitoring equipment, and late or incomplete permit applications. Compliance is tracked via air permit status and inspection records.
Clean Water Act (CWA): Regulates discharge of pollutants to surface waters and groundwater. Providers must obtain NPDES permits (for direct discharge) or follow pretreatment standards. Common violations include unauthorized discharge, exceedance of permitted limits, and incomplete or late reporting.
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA): Oversees hazardous waste handling, storage, and disposal. RCRA violations include improper container management, failure to manifest waste, unpermitted treatment or storage, and incomplete closure procedures.
Scores move down when an entity accumulates violations, fails inspections, misses filing deadlines, or is cited for failure to correct known issues. Scores improve when violations are resolved, inspections pass, and reporting is timely and accurate.
Bottom line
ANDERMATT USA scores well enough to qualify as a lower-risk environmental provider from a regulatory compliance standpoint. However, Verdica's score reflects only EPA regulatory standing; it does not evaluate service quality, pricing, or customer satisfaction. Before engaging this provider, verify that their specific services align with your needs and cross-check references or any available third-party reviews beyond this compliance data.