What Verdica's 831 score means for ANTERO RESOURCES CORPORATION - FIVE H
Antero Resources Corporation's Five H facility in West Virginia received a composite score of 831 out of 850, placing it in Verdica's "excellent" band (800–850). This score reflects strong regulatory standing across three dimensions of environmental compliance tracked by the EPA under federal air, water, and waste management statutes.
A reader should interpret this score as indicating that the facility demonstrates compliance with major federal environmental requirements as of the assessment date. The Five H operation is not flagged for systemic compliance problems in the datasets Verdica monitors. That said, an 831 score—while excellent—is not a perfect 850, meaning the facility has not achieved flawless performance across all measured dimensions. Prospective business partners or regulators should view this as a low-risk profile, but not a guarantee of zero violations or operational issues outside Verdica's data scope.
How the sub-scores break down
Facility Profile (800/850): This sub-score measures the completeness and accuracy of the facility's regulatory registration, permit status, operational classification, and reported characteristics. A score of 800 indicates that Antero Resources' Five H facility has strong documentation on file with regulators. It suggests that the facility is properly permitted and that its operational profile—including size, type of production, and regulated activities—is clearly documented. A lower score in this dimension would flag missing permits, misclassified operations, or gaps in registration data.
Compliance Signals (845/850): This sub-score aggregates signals from EPA compliance monitoring systems, including self-reported data, inspection records, and violation notices. A score of 845 indicates minimal flags in the compliance monitoring record. In the environmental sector, this typically means the facility has avoided major violations, maintained required certifications, and demonstrated responsive reporting. A significant drop in this score would suggest recurring violations, missed reporting deadlines, or unresolved enforcement notices.
Enforcement Actions (850/850): This is a perfect score, reflecting the absence of active or recent enforcement actions from EPA or state regulators. In environmental compliance, enforcement actions range from warning letters and administrative orders to civil penalties and criminal referrals. A perfect 850 means no such actions are indexed in the datasets Verdica uses. This does not mean the facility has never received a notice of violation, but rather that current enforcement records show no unresolved or recent actions.
What regulators in WV track for environmental providers
West Virginia environmental compliance is overseen jointly by the EPA and the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection (WVDEP), with authority distributed across statutes:
Clean Air Act: Facilities must obtain operating permits and comply with emission standards based on their classification (major source, minor source, etc.). Violations include exceeding permitted emission rates, failing stack testing, or operating without required permits. State inspectors monitor through inspections and review continuous monitoring data.
Clean Water Act: Dischargers must obtain NPDES permits and meet effluent limitations. Violations include exceeding permit limits, unpermitted discharges, or inadequate pollution control. Water quality monitoring and permit inspections are routine.
RCRA (Resource Conservation and Recovery Act): Hazardous waste generators and handlers must maintain manifests, manage waste properly, and comply with storage and treatment standards. Violations range from incomplete documentation to improper disposal.
Verdica's score incorporates inspection frequency, violation type and resolution, permit status, and self-monitoring report accuracy from these three regulatory frameworks.
Bottom line
Antero Resources Corporation's Five H facility scores in the excellent range with strong sub-scores across facility registration, compliance monitoring, and enforcement records. A prospective partner or regulator should treat this as a low-risk indicator, though due diligence should also include site-specific questions about operational history, pending permit renewals, and any facility-specific environmental risks not captured in EPA federal compliance data.