What Verdica's 790 score means for MARC & ELIZABETH LATTANZI
MARC & ELIZABETH LATTANZI holds a composite Verdica score of 790 out of 850, placing them in the "strong" band (740–799). This means the entity demonstrates solid environmental compliance relative to EPA standards under federal air, water, and hazardous waste frameworks. A score in this range reflects an environmental provider with an established track record of meeting regulatory obligations and passing regulatory oversight, though not without some documented issues in inspection history.
Readers should interpret this score as a signal of relative stability: the provider is unlikely to face imminent regulatory action or license suspension, but they are not operating at the highest tier of compliance perfection. The 60-point gap between this score and the maximum (850) is driven primarily by inspection findings. For a business owner or individual considering this provider, a 790 score suggests they are safe to work with from a compliance perspective, but due diligence beyond this score—such as reviewing specific inspection reports or requesting references—remains prudent.
How the sub-scores break down
Compliance Status: 850/850 — This perfect sub-score indicates that MARC & ELIZABETH LATTANZI is currently in good standing under the EPA compliance frameworks that govern air emissions, water discharge, and hazardous waste handling in Pennsylvania. A perfect compliance status means no active violations, license suspensions, or regulatory notices are on record. This is the strongest available signal that the entity is operationally aligned with federal requirements.
Inspection History: 700/850 — This sub-score is the weakest component and accounts for most of the gap between the composite score and the maximum. An inspection history score of 700 suggests the entity has undergone regulatory inspections and some findings or observations were noted, even though those findings did not escalate into formal violations or enforcement actions. This is common in regulated industries and typically reflects minor discrepancies, documentation gaps, or procedural adjustments rather than systemic non-compliance.
Enforcement Actions: 850/850 — This perfect sub-score means no civil penalties, fines, consent orders, or remediation directives are recorded against this entity. The absence of enforcement action is significant: it confirms that past inspection findings did not warrant regulatory intervention or financial penalties.
What regulators in PA track for environmental providers
Pennsylvania environmental providers operate under EPA authority across three primary regulatory frameworks:
Clean Air Act compliance focuses on emissions permits, air quality monitoring, and prevention of hazardous air pollutant releases. Violations include operating without a permit, exceeding permitted emission thresholds, or failing to maintain monitoring equipment.
Clean Water Act compliance addresses wastewater discharge permits, stormwater management, and prevention of water contamination. Regulated entities must maintain discharge permits (NPDES), report monitoring data, and prevent spills or unpermitted releases.
RCRA (Resource Conservation and Recovery Act) compliance covers hazardous waste identification, storage, handling, transportation, and disposal. Non-compliance includes improper waste characterization, storage without a permit, or failure to maintain required records.
Regulators conduct periodic inspections to verify permit compliance, record-keeping accuracy, and operational controls. Inspection findings are documented and may be classified as observations (minor) or violations (material). Violations trigger enforcement, which can range from written notice and corrective action orders to civil penalties and license revocation. A strong compliance environment shows minimal inspection findings and no escalated enforcement actions.
Bottom line
MARC & ELIZABETH LATTANZI is a strong environmental provider in Pennsylvania with no active violations or enforcement history. The inspection-related deduction suggests some past findings that warrant a closer look, so prospective customers should request copies of recent inspection reports or ask directly about the nature of those findings before committing to a contract.