What Verdica's 833 score means for MCINTOSH FACILITY
MCINTOSH FACILITY in South Dakota holds a composite score of 833 out of 850, placing it in Verdica's "excellent" band (800–850). This score reflects strong overall environmental compliance and regulatory standing based on EPA data covering air quality, water quality, and hazardous waste management obligations.
A score in this range indicates that the facility meets or exceeds regulatory baselines across the measured compliance dimensions. Readers should interpret this as a signal that the facility has demonstrated consistent adherence to federal environmental standards and has not accumulated significant unresolved enforcement actions or compliance violations in the tracked regulatory categories. The three-point gap from a perfect score (850) suggests there may be minor documentation, profiling, or historical data elements that prevented a maximum rating, but these do not reflect active violations or material risk.
For business owners, consumers, or regulators evaluating this facility, an 833 score should be read as a low-risk environmental profile—not as a guarantee of zero impact, but as evidence of proactive compliance management and regulatory responsiveness.
How the sub-scores break down
Facility Profile (800/850): This sub-score measures the completeness and accuracy of the facility's registered environmental profile—including licensing status, operational permits, and facility classifications under EPA systems. A score of 800 indicates that the facility's public record is substantially complete and current. The 50-point gap from perfect suggests there may be minor gaps in documentation, lags in permit renewal filings, or classification updates that have not yet propagated through EPA systems. This is a common and typically low-risk scenario in facilities with multiple regulatory streams.
Compliance Signals (850/850): This is a perfect sub-score, reflecting the absence of active compliance violations or unresolved alerts in EPA monitoring data. Compliance signals typically include exceedances of air or water discharge limits, missed monitoring or reporting deadlines, and violations of hazardous waste handling standards under RCRA. A perfect score here means the facility has not triggered regulatory red flags in these categories during the measurement period.
Enforcement Actions (850/850): This sub-score also achieves a perfect rating, indicating no open or recent enforcement actions—such as Notices of Violation (NOVs), administrative penalties, or consent decrees—are associated with the facility. In environmental compliance, enforcement actions are the most serious public signals of regulatory problems. A perfect score here demonstrates the facility has not been subject to formal enforcement escalation.
What regulators in SD track for environmental providers
The EPA tracks environmental compliance across three primary federal statutes:
Clean Air Act: Facilities must maintain permits, monitor air emissions, and stay below established limits for regulated pollutants (particulates, nitrogen oxides, sulfur dioxide, volatile organic compounds, and hazardous air pollutants). Violations include exceedances, missed monitoring, and permit lapses.
Clean Water Act: Facilities must hold discharge permits (NPDES), maintain discharge monitoring records, and comply with effluent limits. Violations include unpermitted releases, exceedances, and reporting failures.
RCRA (Resource Conservation and Recovery Act): Facilities that generate, store, or treat hazardous waste must maintain manifests, comply with storage and handling rules, and report waste streams. Violations include improper storage, missing documentation, and unpermitted treatment.
Regulators assign compliance grades based on inspection findings, self-reported monitoring data, and reported incidents. Scores move upward with consistent compliance and move downward with violations, late filings, or enforcement actions.
Bottom line
MCINTOSH FACILITY presents a strong environmental compliance profile with an 833 score, backed by perfect marks in compliance signaling and enforcement history. Any business considering a relationship should still independently verify current permits, request recent inspection reports, and confirm ongoing operations align with their own risk tolerance—but the regulatory data shows no material red flags.