What Verdica's 850 score means for ADVANCED HEALTHCARE OF MESA
ADVANCED HEALTHCARE OF MESA has received an 850 out of 850 composite score from Verdica, placing it in the "excellent" band (800–850). This score reflects performance across three regulatory and quality dimensions tracked by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS): inspection findings, quality measures, and enforcement history.
A score of 850 indicates that the provider has demonstrated compliance across all three measured dimensions. Readers should understand this as a strong regulatory standing relative to the benchmarks CMS uses to assess healthcare providers. This does not constitute a medical endorsement, nor does it guarantee individual patient outcomes; rather, it reflects documented adherence to federal inspection standards, published quality metrics, and the absence of significant enforcement actions on record.
For business owners, payers, referral sources, or consumers evaluating this provider, an 850 score suggests a low-risk profile from a regulatory and documented-quality perspective. The provider is not on a compliance watch list and has not accumulated deficiencies or enforcement records that would trigger elevated scrutiny.
How the sub-scores break down
Inspection & Deficiencies: 850 This sub-score reflects results from CMS surveys and inspections. Healthcare providers are surveyed for compliance with Conditions of Participation (CoPs) and Conditions for Coverage. Surveyors document any deficiencies—areas where the provider fails to meet federal requirements—across categories such as staffing, infection control, medication management, resident/patient rights, and environmental safety. A maximum score of 850 in this dimension means no significant deficiencies or only minor, non-systemic findings were documented in recent inspection cycles. This is the strongest possible result.
Quality Measures: 850 This score is based on publicly reported CMS quality metrics, which vary by provider type. For most healthcare settings, these measures track outcomes such as readmission rates, mortality rates, healthcare-associated infections, patient safety events, and adherence to clinical protocols. A score of 850 indicates performance that meets or exceeds CMS benchmarks across the quality indicators tracked for this provider's category. High quality scores typically correlate with lower adverse event rates and better adherence to evidence-based practices.
Enforcement History: 850 This dimension captures formal enforcement actions taken by CMS or state regulators, including civil monetary penalties, termination or conditional participation agreements, or directed plans of correction. A maximum score means no recent enforcement actions are recorded. The absence of enforcement history suggests the provider has not triggered the regulatory escalation process that follows unresolved deficiencies.
What regulators in AZ track for healthcare providers
CMS and the Arizona Department of Health Services oversee healthcare provider compliance through several mechanisms. Federal inspections (surveys) occur on a cyclic basis and examine compliance with Conditions of Participation. Surveyors may cite deficiencies at different severity levels: isolated, pattern, or systemic. Systemic deficiencies or those affecting immediate jeopardy to patient health and safety carry greater weight in regulatory scoring.
Quality measures are risk-adjusted and publicly reported through CMS databases. These metrics create a transparent benchmark that allows comparison across providers of the same type. Poor performance on quality measures can trigger corrective action requests or increased survey frequency.
Enforcement actions escalate when deficiencies are not remediated. Actions range from financial penalties to loss of Medicare certification. Arizona's state licensing board may also conduct investigations independent of federal surveys, particularly for complaints related to professional conduct or patient safety.
Factors that move scores downward include inspection deficiencies (particularly systemic ones), quality metrics below state or national averages, and any enforcement history within the review period.
Bottom line
ADVANCED HEALTHCARE OF MESA holds an excellent regulatory standing based on available CMS data, with no deficiencies, enforcement actions, or quality shortfalls on record. Stakeholders considering engagement should confirm that this profile aligns with current operational needs and cross-check any specific service lines or specialties against the provider's published quality metrics for their particular patient population.