What Verdica's 850 score means for Alliance Health at Coleman
Alliance Health at Coleman received a composite score of 850 out of 850, placing it in Verdica's highest performance band (800–850), which indicates excellent compliance standing. This score reflects aggregated performance across three regulatory dimensions tracked by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS): inspection results, identified deficiencies, and enforcement history.
A score of 850 means that Alliance Health at Coleman has demonstrated strong adherence to federal healthcare standards across all measured categories. Readers should interpret this as a signal that the provider has passed recent inspections without significant findings, maintained quality measures within acceptable ranges, and has not accumulated enforcement actions. This is the top tier of Verdica's grading system and indicates low regulatory risk relative to peers.
No independent customer reviews are currently indexed for this entity on Verdica's platform, so the score is based entirely on objective regulatory data rather than user experience reports. As reviews accumulate, they may provide additional context around patient and payer satisfaction, but the current compliance picture is strong.
How the sub-scores break down
Inspection & Deficiencies (850/850): This sub-score reflects findings from state and federal surveys conducted at the facility. Inspectors evaluate compliance with Conditions of Participation or Conditions for Coverage—regulatory requirements covering areas like infection control, staffing adequacy, medical record accuracy, and patient safety protocols. A score of 850 indicates that recent inspections identified no substantive deficiencies or only minor, easily correctable observations. In the healthcare industry, even small deficiencies can accumulate over time and signal systemic issues, so a perfect score here is meaningful.
Quality Measures (850/850): CMS publishes standardized quality measures for many provider types—metrics such as readmission rates, mortality rates, appropriate use of medications, patient safety indicators, and care coordination outcomes. These measures allow regulators and the public to compare facilities. A score of 850 on this dimension indicates that Alliance Health at Coleman's reported quality metrics fall within or exceed expected performance ranges. This suggests the provider is delivering care consistent with clinical guidelines and industry benchmarks.
Enforcement History (850/850): This sub-score tracks formal regulatory actions: civil monetary penalties, corrective action plans, license restrictions, or exclusions from federal programs. A perfect score indicates no such actions have been documented against this entity in the data CMS tracks. In healthcare compliance, even one enforcement action typically results in a significant score reduction, so a clean history is noteworthy.
What regulators in MA track for healthcare providers
CMS and state agencies in Massachusetts monitor healthcare providers through announced and unannounced inspections, typically conducted on a scheduled cycle. Surveyors use detailed protocols to assess compliance with federal regulations and state licensure requirements. Common areas of focus include medication management, infection prevention, patient rights, staff training, and quality of clinical care.
Quality measures are reported publicly and include outcome data (e.g., hospital readmission rates, surgical complication rates) and process measures (e.g., percentage of patients screened for specific conditions, timeliness of diagnostic services). These data come from claims, medical records, and direct reporting by providers.
Enforcement actions are triggered by substantive violations found during inspections or reported through complaint investigations. Penalties range from corrective action plans to license suspension or termination, depending on severity.
Bottom line
Alliance Health at Coleman's perfect 850 score indicates a provider with no recent regulatory red flags and strong reported quality performance. This is a strong compliance standing. Anyone considering engagement with this entity should cross-check current state licensure status and request recent inspection reports directly to verify the data underlying this score.