What Verdica's 850 score means for BARRINGTON OF CARMEL, THE
BARRINGTON OF CARMEL, THE has achieved a composite Verdica score of 850 out of 850, placing it in the excellent band (800–850). This score reflects performance across three regulatory dimensions tracked by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS): inspection and deficiency findings, quality measures, and enforcement history.
A perfect or near-perfect score in this band indicates that the provider has demonstrated consistent compliance with federal healthcare standards across all measured areas. It does not mean the provider is flawless—all healthcare operations involve some operational complexity—but rather that regulatory inspections have not identified significant systemic deficiencies, quality reporting shows strong performance relative to peer benchmarks, and there is no material enforcement action on record.
For a business owner, healthcare purchaser, or consumer evaluating this provider, an 850 score suggests low regulatory risk and alignment with federal compliance expectations. This is the highest confidence band available in Verdica's scoring model.
How the sub-scores break down
Inspection & Deficiencies (850/850): This sub-score is derived from unannounced state and federal surveys conducted under CMS oversight. Inspectors assess whether the facility meets conditions of participation, including staffing adequacy, resident safety protocols, infection control, medical record documentation, and administrative oversight. A perfect score in this dimension indicates that recent inspections have not cited significant deficiencies or violations. Minor, corrected findings may still allow a high score; a lower score would reflect repeat violations, systemic lapses in care processes, or failure to timely remediate cited issues.
Quality Measures (850/850): CMS publishes facility-level quality indicators covering clinical outcomes, resident experience, and staffing metrics. These measures vary by provider type but typically include hospital readmission rates, infection rates, staffing hours per resident, and patient satisfaction surveys. A score of 850 in this dimension reflects strong performance on these publicly reported metrics, suggesting the provider is meeting or exceeding national benchmarks.
Enforcement History (850/850): This sub-score reflects the absence of material enforcement actions—such as civil monetary penalties, payment suspension, license suspension, or required management changes. A perfect score indicates no open or recent enforcement actions tied to regulatory violations.
What regulators in IN track for healthcare providers
CMS and the Indiana State Department of Health jointly oversee healthcare provider compliance in Indiana. Their inspection protocols focus on:
- Conditions of Participation (CoPs): Federal requirements covering governance, clinical staff qualifications, infection prevention, medical record management, and resident/patient rights.
- Deficiency Severity: Surveyors classify findings as isolated, pattern, or systemic; uncorrected deficiencies can trigger escalating enforcement.
- Quality Reporting: Providers submit standardized data on clinical outcomes, adverse events, staffing, and patient experience, which CMS publishes and benchmarks.
- Enforcement Tools: Regulators may issue Statements of Deficiency, require Corrective Action Plans, impose Civil Monetary Penalties (CMPs), restrict admissions, or recommend license revocation in cases of serious non-compliance.
The score bands reflect the risk profile associated with these findings: high-deficiency providers (300–579) show systemic compliance gaps; acceptable to strong providers (670–799) show isolated or corrected issues; excellent providers (800–850) show minimal regulatory findings and strong quality data.
Bottom line
BARRINGTON OF CARMEL, THE's 850 score places it in the lowest-risk category for regulatory compliance and quality performance. Anyone considering contracting with, referring to, or using this provider should still independently verify current license status, review any publicly available inspection reports for context, and confirm that the service line or specialty meets their specific need—but the regulatory profile carries minimal red flags based on available CMS data.