What Verdica's 850 score means for CHAFFEE NURSING CENTER
CHAFFEE NURSING CENTER in Missouri has achieved a composite compliance score of 850 out of 850—placing it in Verdica's excellent band (800–850). This score reflects performance across three regulatory dimensions tracked by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS): inspection and deficiency findings, quality measures, and enforcement history.
A perfect 850 indicates that the facility has demonstrated no significant compliance gaps in the data CMS publishes. This does not mean the facility operates with zero issues—all healthcare providers encounter operational challenges—but rather that recent regulatory reviews and quality metrics show no material deficiencies that would trigger CMS concern or enforcement action.
Readers should interpret this as a strong compliance signal. When considering a nursing facility for placement, employment, vendor relationships, or regulatory reference, an 850 score suggests the provider has met or exceeded baseline standards across all measured dimensions. However, this score is based on publicly available CMS data and does not reflect patient satisfaction, staffing experience, or the qualitative aspects of care that independent reviews might capture. Currently, no independent customer reviews are indexed for this entity, so compliance data alone should be supplemented by direct inquiry or site visits if those factors matter to your decision.
How the sub-scores break down
Inspection & Deficiencies (850/850): This sub-score reflects findings from unannounced state health department surveys and complaint investigations conducted on behalf of CMS. Deficiencies are coded by severity—from isolated lapses to widespread systemic failures—and map to federal Conditions of Participation. A perfect 850 indicates no recent substantive deficiency citations. In practice, this means the facility passed inspection without significant violations in areas like infection control, medication management, resident rights, or staff qualifications.
Quality Measures (850/850): CMS tracks clinical and operational quality indicators for nursing facilities, including measures such as pressure ulcer prevalence, medication use patterns, rehospitalization rates, and staffing adequacy. These are risk-adjusted, facility-reported metrics that CMS publishes quarterly. An 850 on this sub-score indicates performance within expected ranges—no alarming outliers that would suggest systematic quality decline. This is a relative measure; it does not confirm excellence in every metric, but rather shows alignment with national benchmarks.
Enforcement History (850/850): This sub-score reflects the absence of recent fines, civil monetary penalties, or corrective action plans issued by CMS or state regulators. If a facility had received penalties for repeat violations or had been placed on a performance improvement plan, this score would decline. A perfect 850 means no active enforcement actions are on record in CMS data.
What regulators in MO track for healthcare providers
Missouri nursing facilities are regulated under the CMS Conditions of Participation (CoPs) and corresponding state licensing rules. State surveyors conduct unannounced inspections at least annually and investigate complaints. Deficiencies are assigned severity tags (A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J) based on scope and severity. Widespread violations can trigger enforcement escalation—including corrective action plans, temporary management, or decertification.
Quality measures tracked include catheter use, antipsychotic medication prevalence, falls, pressure injuries, staffing ratios, and infection rates. These are submitted by facilities to CMS's Nursing Home Compare database and adjusted for case mix.
Enforcement actions—when deficiencies are not corrected within required timelines—may include fines ranging from $100 to $32,000 per day of non-compliance, or loss of Medicare/Medicaid certification, which would be catastrophic for most facilities.
Bottom line
CHAFFEE NURSING CENTER's 850 score reflects a clean regulatory record across inspection, quality, and enforcement data. If compliance track record is a primary selection criterion, this facility presents low regulatory risk. However, since no independent reviews are indexed yet, prospective residents, families, or business partners should independently verify staffing stability, visit the facility, and review any state survey details online to inform a complete picture.