What Verdica's 850 score means for CLEBURNE COUNTY NURSING HOME
CLEBURNE COUNTY NURSING HOME has earned a composite Verdica score of 850 out of 850—the maximum possible score. This places the facility in the "excellent" band (800–850), the highest tier of regulatory and quality performance tracked by Verdica's system.
A score at this level indicates that across all measured dimensions—inspection results, deficiency citations, quality outcomes, and enforcement history—the facility has demonstrated compliance at the highest standard recognized by CMS data. For a nursing home, this reflects consistent performance across the areas regulators and oversight bodies actively monitor. A reader considering this facility should understand that this score represents current publicly available regulatory and quality data; it does not constitute a medical recommendation or guarantee of future performance, but it does signal strong historical alignment with federal compliance benchmarks.
How the sub-scores break down
Inspection & Deficiencies: 850
This sub-score reflects the results of state and federal inspections conducted at the facility. Nursing homes are routinely inspected for compliance with federal participation requirements, resident rights, quality of care, staffing, infection control, and environmental safety. A perfect score in this dimension indicates that inspection findings have not resulted in significant or repeated deficiencies. Facilities with lower scores in this area typically carry citations for violations ranging from minor (tag-level) to serious (immediate jeopardy to resident health or safety). The 850 rating here suggests the facility has maintained a clean or near-clean inspection record relative to the regulatory standards CMS enforces.
Quality Measures: 850
This sub-score aggregates performance on clinical and operational quality indicators tracked by CMS, such as rates of hospital readmission, pressure ulcers, catheter use, antipsychotic medication use, staffing levels, and resident satisfaction. These are outcome-based metrics designed to reflect the actual care experience and safety outcomes residents receive. A maximum score indicates performance that meets or exceeds national benchmarks across the measured quality domains. Facilities scoring lower in this category typically show higher incidence of adverse outcomes, lower staffing ratios, or weaker performance on process-of-care measures.
Enforcement History: 850
This sub-score tracks any formal enforcement actions taken against the facility by state or federal regulators—including civil monetary penalties, temporary management, loss of federal funding eligibility, or license revocation. A perfect score means no recorded enforcement actions within the lookback period used by Verdica's system. Facilities with lower enforcement scores have faced documented regulatory action, which may indicate sustained non-compliance or violations serious enough to trigger penalties.
What regulators in AL track for healthcare providers
CMS enforces compliance through the Conditions of Participation (CoPs), a set of federal standards that nursing homes must meet to receive Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement. State surveyors inspect facilities annually (or more frequently if there is cause) and assign deficiency citations based on CMS protocols. These deficiencies are categorized by scope and severity; repeated or serious violations can lead to enforcement actions including civil money penalties, corrective action plans, or termination from the Medicare program.
Quality Measures tracked include Short-Stay Quality Indicator Sets (QIs) and Long-Stay QIs, which measure outcomes like readmissions, infections, medication safety, and pain management. Staffing levels, both registered nurse hours and overall staff-to-resident ratios, are also monitored. Inspection findings and quality measure data are published on CMS's Nursing Home Compare portal and contribute to Verdica's composite ratings.
Bottom line
CLEBURNE COUNTY NURSING HOME's maximum Verdica score reflects excellent performance across publicly available regulatory and quality metrics. Anyone evaluating this facility should note this strong score while also independently verifying current staffing levels, recent inspection reports, and resident satisfaction feedback through CMS Nursing Home Compare or direct inquiry—regulatory data is a critical input but should inform rather than replace thorough due diligence.