What Verdica's 850 score means for Cloverlodge Care Center
Cloverlodge Care Center holds a composite score of 850 out of 850, placing it in the "excellent" band (800–850). This score reflects performance across three core compliance and quality dimensions tracked by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS): inspection and deficiency findings, quality measures, and enforcement history.
A score in the excellent band indicates that a provider has demonstrated consistent adherence to regulatory standards, reported strong performance metrics, and maintained a clean or minimal enforcement record. For business partners, payers, or consumers evaluating this facility, an 850 score suggests low compliance risk based on available regulatory data. However, it's important to note that Verdica's score relies on CMS data only; no independent customer reviews have been indexed yet, so this assessment reflects regulatory compliance rather than patient or family experience.
How the sub-scores break down
Inspection & Deficiencies: 850 This sub-score measures findings from state and federal inspections conducted under CMS oversight. Inspectors evaluate adherence to Conditions of Participation (CoPs)—mandatory standards covering infection control, staffing, documentation, resident rights, and facility safety. A perfect sub-score here indicates that Cloverlodge has either passed inspections without cited deficiencies or resolved any identified issues promptly and thoroughly. High deficiency counts or repeated violations in the same area would lower this score significantly.
Quality Measures: 850 Quality measures assess clinical and operational outcomes, including metrics such as hospital readmissions, infection rates, pressure ulcer prevalence, medication safety, staffing turnover, and resident satisfaction. For a long-term care facility, these measures directly reflect the consistency and effectiveness of care delivery. An 850 on this dimension indicates performance at or above benchmarks across the tracked indicators, suggesting the facility maintains reliable processes and outcomes monitoring.
Enforcement History: 850 This sub-score reflects the provider's history of regulatory sanctions, including citations, corrective action plans, monetary penalties, or license restrictions. A perfect score indicates no recent or substantive enforcement actions on record. Facilities with enforcement history typically score lower in this dimension—the absence of such history is a favorable signal for operational stability and regulatory standing.
What regulators in NE track for healthcare providers
CMS and Nebraska's Department of Health and Human Services track long-term care and other healthcare providers using standardized inspection protocols and quality reporting systems. Inspectors audit compliance with federal Conditions of Participation covering infection prevention, medication management, staffing adequacy, documentation completeness, resident assessment accuracy, and facility safety. Deficiencies are classified by severity—minor (isolated, unlikely to harm), moderate (could affect outcomes), or severe (immediate jeopardy to health/safety).
Quality measures are extracted from claims data, facility self-reporting (Minimum Data Set submissions), and specialized surveys. These include metrics on falls, infections, medication errors, pressure injuries, and staffing ratios. Regulators also track responses to complaints filed through state or federal hotlines.
Enforcement actions typically stem from repeated deficiencies, complaints indicating serious concerns, or failure to achieve compliance timelines. Actions range from written notices and increased monitoring to financial penalties or license restrictions. A provider's enforcement history reflects responsiveness to identified problems.
Bottom line
Cloverlodge Care Center's perfect 850 score indicates minimal regulatory compliance risk based on CMS inspection results, quality measure performance, and enforcement records. Anyone considering engagement should treat this as a positive indicator, but should still independently verify specific service capabilities, insurance acceptance, and operational fit before making a decision, since the score measures regulatory compliance, not all factors relevant to individual circumstances.