What Verdica's 850 score means for ELLSWORTH HEALTH SERVICES
ELLSWORTH HEALTH SERVICES has achieved a composite score of 850 out of 850, placing it in Verdica's highest performance band (800–850 = excellent). This score reflects consistent compliance across three regulatory dimensions tracked by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS): inspection results, quality measure performance, and enforcement history.
A perfect or near-perfect score in this band indicates that the provider has demonstrated strong adherence to federal healthcare standards, maintained low or no deficiencies during inspections, and has not accumulated enforcement actions. For stakeholders—whether patients, payers, or referring physicians—this score suggests the provider meets or exceeds baseline regulatory expectations. However, it is important to note that the Verdica score measures regulatory compliance, not patient satisfaction or clinical outcomes beyond what CMS quality measures capture. No independent customer reviews are currently indexed for this entity, so the score reflects only official regulatory data.
How the sub-scores break down
Inspection & Deficiencies: 850
This sub-score is based on state and federal inspection findings. Healthcare providers are regularly surveyed by state agencies under CMS authority to verify compliance with Conditions of Participation or Conditions for Coverage. Inspectors document deficiencies ranging from minor to severe. A perfect or near-perfect score in this dimension indicates that ELLSWORTH HEALTH SERVICES has either passed inspections with no cited deficiencies, or any deficiencies cited were corrected promptly and were not systemic in nature. High scores in this category suggest the provider maintains policies, staffing, and operational practices that align with regulatory standards.
Quality Measures: 850
CMS publishes standardized quality metrics for different provider types—hospitals report mortality rates, readmission rates, and infection rates; nursing homes report staffing levels and safety incidents; physician practices report care coordination and preventive screening rates. A score of 850 in this dimension indicates ELLSWORTH HEALTH SERVICES' reported quality measures fall within or above expected performance thresholds. This does not mean the provider is exceptional on every measure, but rather that its performance profile meets regulatory benchmarks and does not trigger quality-of-care concerns at the federal level.
Enforcement History: 850
This sub-score reflects the absence of or minimal history of formal enforcement actions—such as civil money penalties, temporary management, or license restrictions. A perfect score indicates no recent enforcement actions on record with CMS or the Wisconsin state licensing body. Providers with enforcement history typically show lower scores in this dimension.
What regulators in WI track for healthcare providers
Wisconsin's Department of Safety and Professional Services (DSPS) and CMS jointly oversee healthcare provider compliance. The regulatory landscape includes:
- Inspection deficiencies categorized by scope and severity (isolated, pattern, widespread) and by type (infection control, medication management, training, documentation, environmental safety)
- Quality measures such as hospital-acquired infection rates, readmission rates, length of stay, patient safety indicators, and staff-to-patient ratios (nursing homes)
- Licensing and certification status, including any restrictions, probationary periods, or revocation proceedings
- Complaint investigation outcomes, which may result in substantiated or unsubstantiated findings
- Enforcement actions, including financial penalties, denial of new admissions, or facility closure
Scores move downward when inspections uncover systemic deficiencies, quality measures fall below national benchmarks, or enforcement actions are initiated. Scores improve when providers remediate findings, maintain clean inspection records, and sustain strong quality performance over time.
Bottom line
ELLSWORTH HEALTH SERVICES holds an excellent regulatory compliance profile based on current CMS data. For those considering engagement—whether as a referral partner, payer, or prospective patient—this score suggests minimal regulatory risk. However, the Verdica score reflects compliance only; readers should independently verify the provider's accreditation status, clinical specialties, and insurance participation, and consider seeking independent patient feedback or clinical outcome data specific to their needs.