What Verdica's 850 score means for Fairview Manor
Fairview Manor has achieved a composite score of 850 out of 850, placing it in Verdica's highest performance band (800–850 = excellent). This score aggregates three regulatory dimensions tracked by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS): inspection and deficiency findings, quality measures, and enforcement history.
A score of 850 indicates that Fairview Manor has demonstrated compliance across all measured dimensions without material gaps. Readers should interpret this as evidence that the provider has met or exceeded baseline standards in areas CMS actively monitors. This does not constitute a guarantee of quality or safety in absolute terms—it reflects performance within a regulatory framework designed to identify and flag systemic problems. For business partners, insurers, referral sources, or consumers, an 850 score suggests lower regulatory risk and fewer documented compliance issues compared to peers scoring in lower bands.
The score band context matters: facilities in the 300–579 range face documented high-risk findings; those at 580–669 show elevated compliance concerns; 670–739 represents acceptable but unremarkable compliance; 740–799 is strong. At 850, Fairview Manor sits at the top of the distribution, meaning it has not accumulated the deficiencies, quality gaps, or enforcement actions that would lower its standing.
How the sub-scores break down
Fairview Manor's three sub-scores are each 850, indicating consistent performance across all three regulatory domains.
Inspection & Deficiencies (850): This sub-score reflects findings from CMS surveys and state inspections. Surveyors conduct unannounced visits to assess compliance with federal Conditions of Participation or Conditions for Coverage. They document deficiencies ranging in scope and severity. A score of 850 suggests that inspection results have not revealed systemic violations, unresolved safety issues, or repeated non-compliance. Low scores in this dimension typically flag facilities with recurring deficiencies, inadequate remediation, or patterns of regulatory concern.
Quality Measures (850): This score derives from standardized quality metrics CMS collects from healthcare providers—typically including clinical outcomes, patient safety indicators, readmission rates, and care process measures. For nursing facilities and similar settings, these may include measures related to falls, infections, medication use, and resident satisfaction. A score of 850 indicates performance that meets regulatory thresholds across these standardized benchmarks. Lower scores suggest lagging performance on published quality metrics relative to peers or national baselines.
Enforcement History (850): This dimension tracks formal enforcement actions—such as citations, monetary penalties, license restrictions, or mandated corrective action plans—issued by CMS or state regulators. A score of 850 suggests an absence of significant enforcement actions or rapid resolution of any documented issues. Providers scoring lower in this category typically have open enforcement cases, unpaid penalties, or a documented pattern of regulatory action.
What regulators in NE track for healthcare providers
CMS and Nebraska's Department of Health and Human Services monitor healthcare providers through scheduled and complaint-triggered inspections. Surveyors assess adherence to federal Conditions of Participation, which cover governance, staffing, infection control, medication management, resident rights, and care planning.
Quality measures are standardized and publicly reported. These metrics allow comparison across providers and identify outliers. Common measures track patient safety events (falls, pressure injuries, infections), clinical processes (medication reconciliation, care coordination), and outcomes (readmissions, mortality rates).
Enforcement mechanisms include written notice of deficiencies, civil monetary penalties, license suspension or revocation, and mandatory supervision or receivership in severe cases. The severity and frequency of enforcement actions inform the enforcement history score—agencies issue escalating penalties for repeated or serious violations.
Bottom line
Fairview Manor's 850 composite score places it in the top regulatory performance tier, with no documented deficiencies, quality measure gaps, or enforcement actions captured in available CMS data. Individuals or organizations considering engagement with this provider should verify that this regulatory profile aligns with their specific needs, and independently confirm current accreditation or licensing status in Nebraska.