What Verdica's 850 score means for HEBREW HOME FOR THE AGED AT RIVERDALE
HEBREW HOME FOR THE AGED AT RIVERDALE received a composite score of 850 out of 850, placing it in the "excellent" band (800–850). This score reflects performance across three regulatory dimensions tracked by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS): inspection results, quality measures, and enforcement history. A perfect score indicates that the facility has demonstrated compliance across all three areas based on available data.
Readers should understand that this score is built on objective regulatory data, not subjective opinion. It tells you that inspectors and quality monitors have not identified systemic deficiencies, and that enforcement actions have not been initiated or sustained against the provider. This does not guarantee that every individual experience will be flawless, nor does it speak to service quality beyond measurable compliance metrics. What it does mean is that the facility operates within regulatory expectations and has maintained that standing consistently.
For business partners, payers, or families evaluating this provider, the excellent score suggests lower regulatory risk and a track record of meeting state and federal standards for long-term care operations.
How the sub-scores break down
Inspection & Deficiencies (850/850): This sub-score reflects the results of on-site regulatory inspections by New York State health department surveyors. Inspectors document compliance with licensing rules, staffing requirements, infection control protocols, medication management, resident rights, and facility maintenance standards. An 850 score in this dimension indicates that inspections have not uncovered significant violations or patterns of non-compliance. Deficiencies, when found, are typically minor and resolved quickly. Facilities with lower scores in this dimension often have cited violations requiring corrective action plans.
Quality Measures (850/850): This sub-score is derived from CMS's Nursing Home Compare database, which tracks standardized quality indicators such as hospital readmission rates, catheter use, antipsychotic medication use, skilled nursing care outcomes, and staff turnover. An 850 score here means the facility's performance on these clinical and operational metrics meets or exceeds benchmarks. Providers with lower scores in this dimension may show higher rates of adverse outcomes, higher staff turnover, or other indicators flagging operational challenges.
Enforcement History (850/850): This sub-score documents formal regulatory actions—fines, license restrictions, citation appeals, or adverse determinations. An 850 score means no enforcement actions are present in the regulator's record, or any historical actions have been resolved without ongoing penalties. Facilities with lower scores in this dimension have open or recent enforcement actions, indicating a regulator's concern serious enough to warrant formal intervention.
What regulators in NY track for healthcare providers
New York State and CMS monitor long-term care providers through unannounced facility inspections, typically conducted annually. Inspectors review resident care plans, medication administration records, infection prevention measures, staff qualifications, building safety, and grievance handling. Deficiencies are categorized by severity; repeated or serious violations can trigger enforcement.
CMS quality measures focus on resident outcomes and operational transparency. These include rates of pressure injuries, urinary tract infections, falls, hospital readmissions, medication safety, and workforce stability. Facilities report this data quarterly, creating a public performance record.
Enforcement mechanisms include civil monetary penalties, state monitoring requirements, and in severe cases, license suspension or denial of Medicare/Medicaid participation. A clean enforcement history suggests inspectors have not deemed violations egregious enough to warrant these formal actions.
Bottom line
An 850 composite score represents strong regulatory standing with no active compliance concerns based on available CMS data. Anyone considering engagement with this provider should verify current licensing status with New York State and confirm that quality measures remain current, as scores reflect historical performance and can change following new inspections or reported incidents.