What Verdica's 850 score means for Highland Park Care Center
Highland Park Care Center in NE has achieved a composite Verdica score of 850 out of 850, placing it in the excellent band (800–850). This score reflects performance across three regulatory and quality dimensions tracked by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS): inspection results, deficiency findings, and enforcement history.
A score at this level indicates that the provider has demonstrated compliance with federal healthcare standards as measured by these data sources. Readers should understand that this score is not a subjective rating—it is derived from objective regulatory records and quality metrics maintained by CMS. An 850 score means the provider has scored at the maximum in all three tracked dimensions, suggesting a track record of meeting baseline regulatory requirements and quality benchmarks.
It is important to note that this score reflects historical and point-in-time regulatory data. It does not constitute a guarantee of future performance, nor does it replace due diligence by consumers, referral sources, or contracting partners. The score should be one data point among several that an informed stakeholder might review when evaluating a healthcare provider.
How the sub-scores break down
Inspection & Deficiencies (850/850): This sub-score is based on findings from CMS surveys and inspections. Inspectors assess compliance with federal Conditions of Participation and Conditions for Coverage—these are structural, operational, and care-delivery standards. A maximum score in this dimension indicates that recent inspections have not surfaced significant deficiencies, or that any deficiencies identified were resolved. Low scores in this category typically signal unresolved violations or repeat findings across multiple survey cycles.
Quality Measures (850/850): This reflects CMS-reported quality metrics specific to the provider type. For a care center, these typically include measures related to clinical outcomes, resident safety, care processes, and potentially readmission or infection rates. A top score suggests the provider's reported quality indicators meet or exceed baseline performance thresholds. Conversely, low scores often correlate with elevated rates of adverse events, infections, or other quality concerns flagged in CMS data.
Enforcement History (850/850): This sub-score summarizes the provider's history of formal enforcement actions—including citations, fines, license restrictions, or termination of Medicare/Medicaid participation. A perfect score indicates no significant enforcement history in the data available to Verdica. Providers with lower scores in this category typically carry a history of substantive regulatory penalties or ongoing compliance challenges that prompted formal agency action.
What regulators in NE track for healthcare providers
CMS uses a standardized inspection and certification framework to evaluate healthcare providers across all states. Inspectors review compliance with requirements spanning infection control, medication management, staffing adequacy, resident rights, safety protocols, and quality of care. Deficiencies are classified by severity; repeated or systemic failures can trigger enforcement actions.
Quality measures are tracked through multiple reporting mechanisms. Providers submit data on clinical processes, outcomes, and safety events. CMS aggregates and publishes these measures to support transparency. For long-term care providers, examples include rates of pressure injuries, hospital readmissions, antibiotic use, and care plan adherence.
Enforcement in the CMS system ranges from corrective action plans (lowest severity) to civil monetary penalties, license suspension, or termination of program participation (highest severity). These actions are triggered when deficiencies are not remedied or when egregious violations occur. Regulatory data is public and forms the foundation of CMS's Five-Star quality rating system.
Bottom line
Highland Park Care Center scores at the maximum level across all three regulatory dimensions tracked by Verdica, indicating a strong compliance profile based on recent inspection, quality, and enforcement data. Stakeholders considering engagement should cross-check this score against current state licensing records, recent survey reports, and independent patient or family feedback to ensure current performance aligns with historical data.