What Verdica's 850 score means for Holt Senior Care and Rehab Center
Holt Senior Care and Rehab Center has earned a composite Verdica score of 850 out of 850, placing it in the "excellent" band (800–850). This score reflects performance across three regulated dimensions: inspection and deficiency history, quality measures, and enforcement history. A perfect score in each category indicates that the facility has demonstrated compliance with CMS standards across all measured areas.
For readers evaluating this provider, an 850 score signals that available regulatory data shows no significant gaps in the measured compliance domains. This does not mean the facility is risk-free—no healthcare organization operates without operational complexity—but it does mean that CMS inspections and quality reporting have not flagged systemic deficiencies, and enforcement actions have not been initiated based on the data Verdica tracks.
It's important to note that Verdica's score is built on regulatory data from CMS, not patient satisfaction or clinical outcome measures beyond those CMS publicly reports. No independent customer reviews have been indexed yet, so this assessment is confined to what state and federal regulators have documented.
How the sub-scores break down
Inspection & Deficiencies (850/850): This sub-score reflects findings from state health department surveys and CMS inspections. Facilities receive citations for non-compliance with Conditions of Participation—operational, staffing, safety, and care-delivery standards. A perfect score here means the most recent inspection cycle(s) did not result in substantive deficiencies being cited. Lower scores in this category typically signal unresolved violations or repeated findings across multiple inspection years.
Quality Measures (850/850): CMS publicly reports standardized quality metrics for nursing facilities, including data on hospital readmissions, staff turnover, infections, pressure injuries, and medication management. This sub-score reflects how a facility's reported metrics compare to regulatory benchmarks. A perfect score indicates reported performance at or above expected thresholds. Facilities with lower scores in this dimension often show higher rates of adverse events or staffing instability relative to national standards.
Enforcement History (850/850): This tracks formal enforcement actions—civil monetary penalties, mandatory corrective action plans, or loss of CMS certification. A perfect score means no recent enforcement history is on file. Facilities with lower scores in this category have faced financial penalties or compliance agreements with regulators, signaling that deficiencies were serious enough to trigger formal action.
What regulators in MI track for healthcare providers
Michigan's health department, under CMS oversight, conducts unannounced surveys of licensed nursing facilities and rehabilitation centers on a triennial cycle (every three years, or more frequently if complaints are filed). Inspectors assess compliance with Conditions of Participation covering areas such as:
- Adequacy of nursing and medical staffing
- Quality of care planning and documentation
- Infection control and preventive health measures
- Medication management and pharmacy oversight
- Facility safety, maintenance, and food service
- Resident rights and grievance procedures
CMS also aggregates facility-reported quality data submitted through the Nursing Home Compare system, including metrics on readmission rates, staff turnover, vaccination rates, and occurrence of preventable harms. These measures are updated regularly and form the basis for public accountability.
Deficiencies are classified by severity: isolated findings are typically low-level citations, while widespread systemic failures or harm to residents can trigger high-severity citations and enforcement actions. Repeated failures to remedy deficiencies across inspection cycles increase the likelihood of penalties or decertification.
Bottom line
Holt Senior Care and Rehab Center's perfect composite score indicates strong alignment with CMS regulatory standards based on available inspection and quality-reporting data. Anyone considering this facility should verify the score remains current, request details on any recent state surveys, and cross-check independent reviews and patient feedback once they become available, as regulatory compliance is one measure of provider quality but not the only one.