What Verdica's 850 score means for KING'S GRANT RETIREMENT COMMUN
KING'S GRANT RETIREMENT COMMUN has achieved a composite score of 850 out of 850, placing it in Verdica's highest performance band (800–850, graded as "excellent"). This score reflects compliance data aggregated from two primary regulatory domains: inspection and deficiency records, and quality measures tracked by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS).
A score of 850 indicates that the facility has demonstrated strong adherence to federal and state regulatory standards based on the most recent available inspection results and quality reporting data. Readers should interpret this as evidence that regulators have not identified systemic compliance failures or widespread quality gaps in recent oversight activity. However, it is important to note that no independent customer reviews are currently indexed for this entity, so this assessment is based exclusively on regulatory compliance metrics rather than resident or family feedback.
For business owners, payers, or families evaluating this provider, an 850 score signals low regulatory risk relative to the broader healthcare provider landscape. This does not mean the facility is immune to future compliance issues—regulatory performance is assessed on a rolling basis—but it does indicate that available oversight data shows alignment with established standards.
How the sub-scores break down
Verdica's composite score is built from three equally weighted sub-scores, all of which are maxed out at 850 for KING'S GRANT RETIREMENT COMMUN:
Inspection & Deficiencies (850). This sub-score reflects the results of unannounced and scheduled inspections conducted by state survey agencies on behalf of CMS. Inspectors evaluate compliance with Conditions of Participation, which cover staffing adequacy, infection control, medication management, resident rights, safety protocols, and environmental standards. A score of 850 in this dimension indicates that inspection findings have not revealed significant deficiencies. Lower scores in this category typically signal citations for violations ranging from minor administrative lapses to substantiated complaints about care quality or safety.
Quality Measures (850). This sub-score is derived from CMS-reported quality indicators, which include metrics such as hospital readmission rates, catheter-associated infections, pressure ulcer prevalence, medication errors, and resident satisfaction surveys. A maximum score here reflects performance at or above expected benchmarks. Facilities with lower quality measure scores often show elevated rates of adverse events, hospitalizations, or poor outcomes relative to peers.
Enforcement History (850). This sub-score tracks formal regulatory actions such as civil monetary penalties, payment suspensions, or license restrictions. A score of 850 indicates no recent or ongoing enforcement actions in the available data. Facilities with lower scores in this category have faced documented enforcement by state licensure boards or CMS, typically triggered by failure to remediate prior deficiency findings.
What regulators in VA track for healthcare providers
Virginia's healthcare providers are subject to oversight by the Virginia Department of Health (acting as the state survey agency for CMS) and direct CMS monitoring for Medicare-participating facilities. Regulators track a comprehensive set of compliance domains:
Inspection findings examine adherence to federal Conditions of Participation, including resident safety, staff qualifications, infection prevention, medical record documentation, and complaint resolution procedures. Deficiencies are typically categorized by severity (from minor to immediate jeopardy).
Quality measures monitor clinical and operational outcomes, including hospital transfers, preventable complications, medication administration accuracy, and resident experience scores reported through standardized CMS instruments.
Enforcement actions may include warnings, directed plans of correction, payment reductions, or license restrictions if deficiencies are not remediated within required timelines.
Movement in Verdica's score reflects changes in these regulatory inputs as new inspection cycles are completed and quality data is published quarterly or annually.
Bottom line
KING'S GRANT RETIREMENT COMMUN demonstrates strong compliance performance based on available regulatory data, with no deficiencies, enforcement actions, or quality measure gaps evident in the current assessment. Anyone considering engagement with this provider should cross-check the facility's most recent inspection reports on the CMS Care Compare website and confirm current licensure status with the Virginia Department of Health to ensure the regulatory picture has not shifted since this score was calculated.