What Verdica's 850 score means for MEMORIAL AMBULATORY SURGERY CENTER
MEMORIAL AMBULATORY SURGERY CENTER has earned a composite score of 850 out of 850, placing it in Verdica's "excellent" band (800–850). This score reflects the provider's performance across three regulatory dimensions tracked by CMS: inspection and deficiencies, quality measures, and enforcement history. A perfect or near-perfect score in this band indicates the provider has demonstrated compliance with federal and state healthcare standards, minimal or no documented deficiencies during inspections, and a clean enforcement record. Readers should interpret this as evidence that the provider meets or exceeds regulatory baseline expectations and poses low compliance risk based on the data CMS publicly reports. This does not constitute a medical quality endorsement, nor does it replace due diligence specific to your facility's needs—but it does signal that regulators have not identified systemic compliance gaps.
How the sub-scores break down
Inspection & Deficiencies: 850 This sub-score reflects findings from state and federal inspections of the facility's operations, equipment, staffing, and adherence to Conditions of Participation (CoPs). A perfect score in this dimension indicates inspectors have not identified substantive violations or deficiencies that would trigger remediation requirements. Facilities with lower scores in this category typically carry citations for issues ranging from minor documentation gaps to serious safety or infection control lapses. A high score here suggests the facility maintains its physical plant, protocols, and documentation to regulatory standard.
Quality Measures: 850 CMS tracks clinical and operational quality metrics for ambulatory surgery centers, including but not limited to infection rates, readmission rates, patient safety indicators, and adherence to care protocols. This sub-score reflects how the facility's reported outcomes compare to regulatory thresholds and benchmarks. A perfect score indicates the provider's quality data meets or exceeds expected performance. Lower scores would typically signal higher-than-expected adverse event rates, infection rates, or other clinical quality concerns.
Enforcement History: 850 This sub-score aggregates CMS enforcement actions—including civil monetary penalties, license restrictions, corrective action plans, or termination threats. A perfect score indicates no recent enforcement history on the public record. Providers with lower scores may have faced formal sanctions, payment suspensions, or required corrective actions. This dimension is forward-looking; it reflects whether regulators have had to intervene to compel compliance.
What regulators in TX track for healthcare providers
CMS's Conditions of Participation and Revised Conditions for Coverage establish baseline requirements for ambulatory surgery centers operating in Texas. Inspectors examine facility licensing, credentialing of providers, infection prevention and control, anesthesia management, patient rights, quality assessment, and medical record accuracy. Quality measures tracked by CMS include surgical site infection rates, hospital readmission rates within 30 days, complications, and adherence to evidence-based care protocols.
Deficiencies are categorized by severity. Minor findings (e.g., incomplete documentation) may not reduce compliance scoring substantially. Serious deficiencies (e.g., failure to screen for infections, unsafe anesthesia protocols, or staffing violations) trigger corrective action requirements and typically lower scores meaningfully. Repeat violations or failure to remediate can lead to enforcement actions—penalties, payment suspension, or license revocation.
Texas also requires state licensure through the Texas Department of Health and Human Services. CMS reports aggregate quality and safety data publicly; individual performance against these metrics directly influences compliance scoring.
Bottom line
MEMORIAL AMBULATORY SURGERY CENTER's 850 score indicates strong regulatory standing across all tracked dimensions. If you are considering a business, referral, or contractual relationship, this score suggests low compliance risk based on publicly available CMS data. You should independently verify current licensing status, request recent inspection reports, and review any patient safety data specific to your clinical area of interest.